Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Abstract

Kyphosis does not equal vertebral fractures: the Rancho Bernardo study.

Diane L Schneider, Denise von Mühlen, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor and David J Sartoris
The Journal of Rheumatology April 2004, 31 (4) 747-752;
Diane L Schneider
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Denise von Mühlen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J Sartoris
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Kyphosis is considered a clinical sign of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. We examined the association of radiographically defined kyphosis with vertebral fractures to determine if this belief was true. METHODS: A total of 1407 ambulatory white adults, aged 50-96 years, from the middle-class community of Rancho Bernardo, California, USA, attended a 1992-96 research clinic visit. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the hip and spine, and lateral thoracolumbar spine radiographs were obtained. The degree of kyphosis was determined using the modified Cobb method. RESULTS: A total of 114 of 553 men (20.6%) and 188 of 854 women (22.0%) had one or more thoracic vertebral fractures. Degenerative disc disease was observed in 45.4% of men and 56.7% of women. The mean age-adjusted Cobb angle was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in men and women with vertebral fractures in comparison to those without vertebral fractures: men 51.3 degrees vs 41.5 degrees, respectively, and women 56.4 degrees vs 46.3 degrees. The prevalence of vertebral fracture increased with higher Cobb angles and there was no significant difference by sex. The proportion of women with osteoporosis increased with the increase of Cobb angle. In the upper quartile of the Cobb angle distribution (> or = 55.5 degrees ), only 36.2% of men and 36.9% of women had prevalent thoracic vertebral fractures; and osteoporosis using WHO BMD criteria was present at the total hip in 9.7% of men and 32.7% of women. CONCLUSION: The majority of men and women with exaggerated kyphosis (the upper quartile of the Cobb angle) had no evidence of thoracic vertebral fractures or osteoporosis. Degenerative disc disease, not vertebral fractures, was the most common finding associated with radiographically defined angle of kyphosis in men and women. Thus kyphosis per se should not be considered diagnostic of osteoporosis. Nevertheless, patients with exaggerated kyphosis should be evaluated for underlying osteoporotic fracture.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 31, Issue 4
1 Apr 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Kyphosis does not equal vertebral fractures: the Rancho Bernardo study.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Kyphosis does not equal vertebral fractures: the Rancho Bernardo study.
Diane L Schneider, Denise von Mühlen, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, David J Sartoris
The Journal of Rheumatology Apr 2004, 31 (4) 747-752;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Kyphosis does not equal vertebral fractures: the Rancho Bernardo study.
Diane L Schneider, Denise von Mühlen, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, David J Sartoris
The Journal of Rheumatology Apr 2004, 31 (4) 747-752;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire