Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Abstract

Efficacy and safety of mesalazine (Salofalk) in an open study of 20 patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

J Christiaan van Denderen, Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma, P Dick Bezemer and Ben A C Dijkmans
The Journal of Rheumatology July 2003, 30 (7) 1558-1560;
J Christiaan van Denderen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P Dick Bezemer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ben A C Dijkmans
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mesalazine (Salofalk) was found to be effective and showed low toxicity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The association of gut lesions and spondyloarthropathy (SpA) is well known and we studied the efficacy and safety of a relatively high dose of mesalazine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: In an open study, mesalazine (3-4 g/day) was prescribed for 24 weeks to 20 patients (aged 18-70 yrs) with active AS, defined as the presence of at least one clinical criterion (morning stiffness > 30 min, peripheral synovitis, enthesopathy, or pain score > 2 on a visual analog scale of 10 cm) and one laboratory criterion [erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) > 20 mm/h or C-reactive protein (CRP) > 20 mg/l]. Data on toxicity and disease activity variables (ESR, CRP, BASDAI, BASFI, BASMI, global assessment, and joint count) were obtained at baseline and after 4, 12, and 24 weeks, and analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Study patients had a mean age of 41 years, with mean disease duration of 7.9 years and a mean ESR at baseline of 29 mm/h. After a mean of 9.3 weeks (range 2-22), 8 of the 20 patients prematurely stopped the medication because of adverse effects, mainly gastrointestinal complaints. Twelve patients completed the 24 weeks of the study using a mean dose of 3.2 g/day (range 1-4) mesalazine. Analysis of the data showed improvement in ESR, CRP, and physician's global assessment, but only the change in ESR (29 mm/h on baseline and 25 mm/h at week 24) reached statistical significance (p = 0.03). No change was observed in the other disease activity variables. CONCLUSION: No significant improvement in any disease activity variable of active AS was observed during treatment with Salofalk except for the ESR. Many side effects were seen.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 30, Issue 7
1 Jul 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Efficacy and safety of mesalazine (Salofalk) in an open study of 20 patients with ankylosing spondylitis.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Efficacy and safety of mesalazine (Salofalk) in an open study of 20 patients with ankylosing spondylitis.
J Christiaan van Denderen, Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma, P Dick Bezemer, Ben A C Dijkmans
The Journal of Rheumatology Jul 2003, 30 (7) 1558-1560;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Efficacy and safety of mesalazine (Salofalk) in an open study of 20 patients with ankylosing spondylitis.
J Christiaan van Denderen, Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma, P Dick Bezemer, Ben A C Dijkmans
The Journal of Rheumatology Jul 2003, 30 (7) 1558-1560;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire