Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Abstract

Most patients receiving routine care for rheumatoid arthritis in 2001 did not meet inclusion criteria for most recent clinical trials or american college of rheumatology criteria for remission.

Tuulikki Sokka and Theodore Pincus
The Journal of Rheumatology June 2003, 30 (6) 1138-1146;
Tuulikki Sokka
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theodore Pincus
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of 2 cohorts of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Nashville, Tennessee, who met 4 common criteria for inclusion in clinical trials: > or = 6 swollen joints, > or = 6 tender joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate > or = 28 mm/h, and/or morning stiffness > or = 45 min. METHODS: Two cohorts of patients with RA, all of whom had met American Rheumatism Association (ARA) [now American College of Rheumatology (ACR)] criteria for RA at some time, were studied. Cohort L (late) included 146 consecutive patients whose mean disease duration was 14.0 years and who had been under care at a weekly academic rheumatology clinic for a mean of 6.2 years when seen in 1998-2001. Cohort E (early) included 232 patients of 5 private practice rheumatologists whose symptoms began in 1998 or later and whose mean disease duration was 1.8 years when seen in 2001. Patients were reviewed for the 4 inclusion criteria as well as 6 ARA remission criteria. RESULTS: In Cohort L, on a 28 joint count, 42.5% of patients had > or = 6 swollen joints, 25.3% had > or = 6 tender joints, 19.9% had both > or = 6 swollen and > or = 6 tender joints, 25.0% had ESR > or = 28, and 45.9% had morning stiffness > or = 45 min. In Cohort E, on a 42 joint count, 63.4% of patients had > or = 6 swollen joints, 50.4% had > or = 6 tender joints, 38.8% had both > or = 6 swollen and > or = 6 tender joints, 49.3% had ESR > or = 28, and 50.9% had morning stiffness > or = 45 min. Overall, 15.3% of Cohort L and 34.1% of Cohort E patients had > or = 6 swollen and tender joints, as well as an ESR > or = 28 or morning stiffness > or = 45 min. Only 4.1% of Cohort L and no patient in Cohort E met ARA criteria for remission. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients seen in routine care in these 2 cohorts did not meet criteria for inclusion in most contemporary RA clinical trials, including clinical trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies to introduce new drugs or biological agents. Few of these patients met ARA criteria for remission. Controlled trial data are not available concerning results of treatment with new biological agents or disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in a large proportion, if not a majority, of patients with RA at this time.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 30, Issue 6
1 Jun 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Most patients receiving routine care for rheumatoid arthritis in 2001 did not meet inclusion criteria for most recent clinical trials or american college of rheumatology criteria for remission.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Most patients receiving routine care for rheumatoid arthritis in 2001 did not meet inclusion criteria for most recent clinical trials or american college of rheumatology criteria for remission.
Tuulikki Sokka, Theodore Pincus
The Journal of Rheumatology Jun 2003, 30 (6) 1138-1146;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Most patients receiving routine care for rheumatoid arthritis in 2001 did not meet inclusion criteria for most recent clinical trials or american college of rheumatology criteria for remission.
Tuulikki Sokka, Theodore Pincus
The Journal of Rheumatology Jun 2003, 30 (6) 1138-1146;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire