Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Abstract

Autoantibodies to proteinase 3 and myeloperoxidase in systemic sclerosis.

Amelia Ruffatti, Renato Alberto Sinico, Antonella Radice, Elena Ossi, Franco Cozzi, Marta Tonello, Panagiotis Grypiotis and Silvano Todesco
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2002, 29 (5) 918-923;
Amelia Ruffatti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Renato Alberto Sinico
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonella Radice
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena Ossi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franco Cozzi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marta Tonello
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Panagiotis Grypiotis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silvano Todesco
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the prevalence and clinical significance of proteinase 3 (PR3-) and myeloperoxidase (MPO-) antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in 115 patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc, scleroderma). METHODS: Sera were assayed by 2 independent centers, which used indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and direct ELISA as screening tests. Inhibition-ELISA for PR3- and MPO-ANCA and PR3 capture-ELISA experiments were also performed. The clinical features of the ANCA positive were compared with those of the ANCA negative scleroderma patients. RESULTS: The IIF test revealed 5 P-ANCA positive sera (4.34%). Surprisingly, by ELISA 2 of these were PR3-ANCA positive, one was MPO-ANCA positive, and 2 were both PR3- and MPO-ANCA positive. In addition, 3 IIF negative sera were ELISA positive, 2 for PR3- and one for MPO-ANCA. ELISA results were confirmed by fluid phase inhibition experiments. Only 2 out of the 6 PR3-direct ELISA positive sera were positive by PR3-capture ELISA at low titers. Neither PR3- nor MPO-ANCA were significantly associated to any clinical feature of patients with SSc. CONCLUSION: As well as the previously described MPO-ANCA, even PR3-ANCA may be detected in some sera from patients with SSc. The IIF pattern and the negative results obtained with PR3-capture ELISA suggest that different epitopes from those recognized by vasculitis sera might be involved with PR3-ANCA in SSc, and show the importance of combining IIF and ELISA tests for ANCA detection.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 29, Issue 5
1 May 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Autoantibodies to proteinase 3 and myeloperoxidase in systemic sclerosis.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Autoantibodies to proteinase 3 and myeloperoxidase in systemic sclerosis.
Amelia Ruffatti, Renato Alberto Sinico, Antonella Radice, Elena Ossi, Franco Cozzi, Marta Tonello, Panagiotis Grypiotis, Silvano Todesco
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2002, 29 (5) 918-923;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Autoantibodies to proteinase 3 and myeloperoxidase in systemic sclerosis.
Amelia Ruffatti, Renato Alberto Sinico, Antonella Radice, Elena Ossi, Franco Cozzi, Marta Tonello, Panagiotis Grypiotis, Silvano Todesco
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2002, 29 (5) 918-923;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire