Reviewers
Editorial Committee
Manuscripts submitted to The Journal of Rheumatology are assessed and assigned to reviewers by the Editor and Editorial Committee at the first bi-weekly editorial committee meeting following submission. Manuscripts that are judged by the committee to meet current editorial and priority criteria are retained and sent for peer review. Up to 3 reviewers are sought for review of a manuscript.
Invitation to Review
Invitations to review, which include a copy of the abstract, are emailed by the editors. When a reviewer accepts a request to review, The Journal will email a link providing access to the full manuscript. On completion of their assessment, reviewers are asked to visit our online submission system at ScholarOne Manuscripts to submit their comments. Reviewers have 21 days to complete a review.
Confidentiality
Reviewers are asked to respect the confidential nature of the information to be evaluated. Manuscripts reviewed for The Journal should not be discussed with anyone who is not directly involved in the review process. If colleagues are consulted, they should be identified to the editors. Reviewers should not disclose their identity to the authors or to other colleagues.
Effective Reviews
While the primary purpose of the evaluation is to provide the editors with the information they need to reach a decision on the value of the manuscript, reviews should also provide separate suggestions to authors on how to strengthen their manuscript.
Feedback. Reviewer feedback is therefore helpful when provided in two forms: as confidential comments reserved for the editors and as open comments to be shared directly with the authors and co-reviewers. These two types of comments should be prepared and inserted as separate texts in the fields provided for each. When preparing commentary directed to the authors, assessment should focus on the manuscript and should be expressed in an objective and neutral tone. Dispassionate and constructive criticism is invited; and the editor reserves the right to edit or delete comments judged to be inappropriate.
Criteria. Reviewers are asked to make a recommendation as to the suitability of the manuscript for publication based on the following criteria:
- originality
- clinical and/or scientific significance
- scientific reliability
- clarity and presentation
When making their recommendation, reviewers will want to keep in mind that other reviewer recommendations, including those with conflicting assessments, will be considered by the editors. Other editorial considerations may also bear on a final decision.
Structure. The most effective reviews often include the following:
- An initial paragraph that summarizes major findings presented and the reviewer's overall conclusions as to major strengths and shortcomings of the manuscript.
- Reviewer comments that are numbered and broken down into major and minor criticisms if appropriate. The numbering of comments facilitates the editor's evaluation of the manuscript and the author's response.
Need Help? For further assistance submitting your review online, please visit ScholarOne© Manuscripts for the Reviewer User Guide.
Become a Reviewer
The Journal of Rheumatology welcomes new reviewers eager to contribute to the literature. Please contact the Manuscripts Department on how to start.