Elsevier

The Surgeon

Volume 9, Issue 1, February 2011, Pages 18-21
The Surgeon

Does bariatric surgery prior to lower limb joint replacement reduce complications?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2010.08.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Obesity is an increasing health concern in developed world. Bariatric surgery is considered in super-obese patients. Many of these patients will also require lower limb arthroplasty. This study was performed to investigate the complications of hip and knee replacement in patients who had bariatric surgery either before or after their joint replacement. Hospital episode statistics data for English NHS patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty and bariatric surgery between 2005 and 2009 were analysed. The joint replacement-specific and general medical complications were compared between those undergoing joint replacement prior to bariatric surgery and vice versa, and also with the general English arthroplasty patient. One hundred and forty-three patients underwent bariatric surgery and joint replacement. Bariatric surgery was performed first in 53 and arthroplasty first in 90 patients. The mean age of obese patients was 9 years younger than the general arthroplasty population. Mean in-hospital stay was similar but general medical complications in obese patients appear to be less, possibly because of the lower age at the time of the procedure. Hip dislocation rate at 18 months was higher. Within the two obese groups wound infection rate was 3.5 times lower and readmission to hospital at 30 days appeared to be 7-times lower in patients who had bariatric surgery prior to joint replacement (p = 0.06). In this patient group, the risk of complications following joint replacement appears to be lower if bariatric surgery is performed first.

Introduction

Obesity is increasing to epidemic levels across the developed world. In a recent study of obesity in the United States, the age-adjusted prevalence was 33.8%.1 About half the adults in England and Wales are overweight and about a quarter are obese.2 The number of obese people has trebled in the last 20 years.3 This has proven general health risks including Type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, fatty liver, cardiovascular, cerebro-vascular and peripheral vascular disease and obstructive sleep apnoea.7 Obesity is classified on the basis of Body Mass Index (BMI) thresholds from overweight to super-obese (Table 1). A 5-point increase in BMI over 25 has been shown to be associated with 30% increased risk of overall mortality.7

There are non-surgical treatments for weight loss such as dietary modification, drug therapy, increasing exercise levels and behavioural changes. These are effective in a proportion of highly motivated individuals.17, 18 Bariatric surgery has been shown to produce effective long-term weight loss.18, 19 Cost effectiveness is proven7 and the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines suggest bariatric surgery is beneficial for patients with a BMI over 40, and could be used as a first line treatment for those with BMI over 50.4, 9 Currently only 1–3% of obese patients have bariatric surgery.21 This is likely to increase.

Bariatric surgery, particularly involving bilio-pancreatic diversion, carries a risk of malnutrition and a dietary regime of supplementation is necessary to avoid micronutrient deficiency.7 Gastric banding is most commonly performed procedure. It has 22–35% risk of late complications and failure. Overall risk of mortality from all types of bariatric surgery is 0.28%.7

The Canadian joint replacement registry10 demonstrates that increasing body mass index is a risk factor for requirement of joint arthroplasty. Degenerative joint disease reduces mobility of these patients and makes it difficult to lose weight.11 Joint replacement in obese patients has shown improvement in pain and function independent of BMI12, 13 and Parvizi et al.8 showed significant improvement in function over two to eleven years in patients who had bariatric surgery and then lower limb joint replacement. Joint replacement for pain however does not necessarily mean patients loose weight. Dowsey et al.6 in their study of 529 knee replacements in obese patients, found at 12 months that 12.6% patients lost weight, but 21% gained weight. Arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients is technically more difficult, it takes longer to perform and may increase the risk of early complications.5, 6, 14, 15, 16

The aim of this study was to investigate the complications of hip and knee replacement in patients who had bariatric surgery either before or after their joint replacement. Peri- and post-operative complications in these patients were also compared to an unselected unmatched arthroplasty population.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Procedural and diagnosis data is collected on all NHS patients (in the form of OPCS and ICD-10 codes), and collated nationally to form the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database in England. Surgical codes specific to various bariatric procedures, arthroplasty procedures and complications were sought (Table 2). All patients who underwent bariatric surgery and a hip or knee arthroplasty in the NHS in England between 2005 and 2009 were included if they carried the diagnosis code for obesity.

Results

Following HES data matching, we identified 519,297 lower limb joint replacement procedures which were performed between 2005 and 2009. There were 227,390 hip replacements, 23,092 hip resurfacing arthroplasties and 268,815 knee replacements.

There were 53 (19 THR, 3 hip resurfacing and 31 TKR) at least six months before bariatric surgery and 90 joint replacement procedures (37 TKR and 53 THR) performed at least six months after bariatric surgery. The comparison of complications between the

Discussion

Obese patients are present for arthroplasty at a younger age. This may explain the shorter in-patient stay and lower risk of myocardial or cerebro-vascular complications observed in these patients.

The 90-day mortality following TJR in unselected English arthroplasty patients was 0.37% compared to 0.7% in the bariatric surgery patients. Given the small number of the patients and lack of further information it is difficult to conclude that obese patients, or indeed patients who have bariatric

Conclusion

In patients being considered for both bariatric surgery and lower limb joint replacement the risk of complications following joint replacement appears to be lower if bariatric surgery is performed first.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (81)

  • Does bariatric surgery really benefit patients before total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis

    2022, International Journal of Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    In comparison with the control group, patients with prior bariatric surgery had a higher risk of blood transfusion (OR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.68 to 2.00, p < 0.00001), with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%) (Fig. 5) (Table 3). Only 3 studies (n = 52156) reported on the risk of mortality within 30 days postoperatively [15,19,21]. No significant differences were found in both groups (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.08 to 12.48, p = 1.00), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 81%) (Fig. 6) (Table 3).

  • Preoperative assessment and prehabilitation in patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery: A systematic review

    2022, Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
    Citation Excerpt :

    The orthopaedic studies were all cohort studies and mainly reported on preoperative bariatric surgery as a method of prehabilitation. They reported no difference or worse outcomes [29,39,47,49–52]. The two general surgical studies were both randomised controlled trials: one used a dietary intervention and showed no difference between groups, and the study reporting a multi-disciplinary intervention showed improved outcomes in some but not all study measures [7,41].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text