Levels of mannan-binding lectin-associated serine protease-2 in healthy individuals

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2003.08.012Get rights and content

Abstract

The lectin pathway is part of the innate immune system providing a first line of defence against infections. Mannan-binding lectin (MBL) and ficolins, in complex with MBL-associated serine proteases (MASPs), are capable of activating the complement system, thus mediating the destruction of infectious agents. MASP-2 cleaves C4 and C2 and is thus crucial for the activation of downstream complement components. We present an assay for quantifying total MASP-2 in plasma and serum samples. The assay is a sandwich type assay using a combination of two monoclonal anti-MASP-2 antibodies, one directed against the N-terminal part of MASP-2 and the other against its C-terminal part. Based on a population of Danish blood donors, the average MASP-2 concentration was estimated at 534 (S.D.±213) ng per ml of plasma. Characterization of the MASP-2 protein in serum showed high stability at 4 °C and at ambient temperature but a rapid decline at 37 °C. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) indicated that all MASP-2 in serum is present in complexes with MBL and ficolins.

Introduction

The ability of lectins, i.e., carbohydrate-binding proteins, and other pattern recognition molecules to distinguish between self and non-self is one of the characteristics of innate immunity. Mannan-binding lectin (MBL) and L- and H-ficolin detect pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and promote destruction of pathogens by activating effector mechanisms of the complement system (Holmskov et al., 2003). MBL shows selectivity for carbohydrates presenting 3- and 4-OH groups in the equatorial plane of the ring structure (Weis et al., 1992), while the epitopes recognized by ficolins have not been defined, but are present in, e.g., N-acetyl-glucosamine (GlcNAc) (Matsushita et al., 1996).

For activating the complement system, MBL, L- and H-ficolin rely on associated serine proteases. These were first discovered in complex with MBL and are referred to as MBL-associated serine proteases (MASPs). MBL, L- and H-ficolin Matsushita et al., 2000a, Matsushita et al., 2002 are associated with three MASPs, termed MASP-1 (Matsushita and Fujita, 1992), MASP-2 (Thiel et al., 1997) and MASP-3 (Dahl et al., 2001) as well as with a non-enzymatic protein referred to as MBL-associated protein of 19 kDa (MAp19) (Stover et al., 1999) or small MBL-associated protein (sMAP) (Takahashi et al., 1999). MAp19 comprises the first two domains of MASP-2, followed by an extra sequence of four unique amino acids. MASPs and MAp19 have been reported to bind to MBL in a calcium-dependent manner (Wallis and Dodd, 2000). It appears that the EGF-like domain of MASP-2, assisted by the two surrounding CUB domains, is involved in the calcium-dependent complex formation (Feinberg et al., 2003). Since MAp19 does not contain the second CUB domain, this domain is likely not to be crucial for complex formation, but nevertheless contributes to a more stable interaction (Thielens et al., 2001).

Thiel et al. (1997) discovered MASP-2 by affinity chromatography of plasma on mannan- and N-acetylglucosamine-derivatized Sepharose beads, and MASP-2 was shown to activate C4. The activation of MASP-1 and -2 in the MBL complex was initially thought to resemble the sequential activation of C1r and C1s of the C1 complex. However, experiments with recombinant MASP-2 showed that complexes comprising only rMBL and rMASP-2 were sufficient for C4 and C2 activation (Vorup-Jensen et al., 2000). MASP-1 does not activate MASP-2 but shows a weak C3 as well as a C2 activating capacity (Matsushita et al., 2000b). Recently, a genetically determined deficiency of MASP-2 was described (Stengaard-Pedersen et al., 2003). The mutation of a single nucleotide leads to an ASP-Gly exchange in the CUB1 domain and renders MASP-2 incapable of binding to MBL.

In the present paper, we describe the development of a specific assay for MASP-2, and use this assay to establish normal levels of the protein in human serum and plasma.

Section snippets

Monoclonal anti-MASP-2 antibody (MAb 8B5)

Female Wistar rats (8 weeks old) were injected subcutaneously with 3 μg of recombinant human CCP1/2-SP fragment of MASP-2 (Rossi et al., 2001) emulsified in complete Freund's adjuvant and boosted three times with 3 μg of CCP1/2-SP in incomplete Freund's adjuvant. Three days prior to removal of the spleen, the rat with the highest antibody titre was boosted intravenously with 3 μg of CCP1/2-SP in saline.

Fusion of a suspension of spleen cells with mouse myeloma cells (X63-Ag8.653) and culture on

Results

We successfully produced two hybridomas, one (8B5) recognizing MASP-2 only and the other (6G12) recognizing both MASP-2 and MAp19. MAb 8B5 recognized a 75-kDa band representing MASP-2 on immunoblots of non-reduced MBL/MASP complexes, whereas no signal was seen with reduced samples, suggesting that the epitope is sensitive to SDS and reduction. MAb 6G12 recognized the same 75-kDa band as well as a 19-kDa band representing MAp19 on non-reduced as well as on reduced samples. A sandwich assay based

Discussion

We describe a quantitative assay for estimating MASP-2 in plasma and serum. A special consideration with such an assay is the presence of MAp19, which is an alternative splicing product of the MASP-2 gene. The two proteins share the first 166 amino acid residues, representing the first CUB domain and the EGF-like domain. MAp19 has four unique amino-acid residues (EQSL) at its C-terminal, while MASP-2 has another CUB domain, two CCP domains and a serine protease domain (Stover et al., 1999). The

References (26)

  • J.L. Guesdon et al.

    The use of avidin–biotin interaction in immunoenzymatic techniques

    J. Histochem. Cytochem.

    (1979)
  • U. Holmskov et al.

    COLLECTINS AND FICOLINS: humoral lectins of the innate immune defense

    Annu. Rev. Immunol.

    (2003)
  • H. Liu et al.

    Characterization and quantification of mouse mannan-binding lectins (MBL-A and MBL-C) and study of acute phase responses

    Scand. J. Immunol.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text