Elsevier

Journal of Autoimmunity

Volume 32, Issues 3–4, May–June 2009, Pages 240-245
Journal of Autoimmunity

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS): Descriptive analysis of a series of 280 patients from the “CAPS Registry”

This article is dedicated to the memory of Ronald A. Asherson and Josep Font who coordinated this registry since its creation and passed away recently.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2009.02.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To describe the clinical and laboratory features, as well as the precipitating factors, treatment and outcome of patients with catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

Methods

We analyzed the 280 patients included until September 2008 in the website based international registry of patients with catastrophic APS (“CAPS Registry”) (http://www.med.ub.es/MIMMUN/FORUM/CAPS.HTM).

Results

The entire series includes 201 (72%) female and 79 (28%) male patients with a mean age of 37 ± 14 years (range, 11–60 years). A total of 129 (46%) patients suffered from primary APS, 112 (40%) from systemic lupus erythematosus, 14 (5%) from lupus-like disease, and 25 (9%) from other autoimmune diseases. The catastrophic episode was the first manifestation of the APS in 129 (46%) patients. A precipitating factor was reported in 53% of the patients. The first clinical manifestation at the time of the catastrophic episode was a pulmonary complication in 24% of the cases, a neurologic feature in 18% and a renal feature in 18%. During the catastrophic episode, intraabdominal involvement was identified in the majority of patients, mainly consisting of renal (71%), hepatic (33%), gastrointestinal (25%), splenic (19%), adrenal (13%), and pancreatic (8%) manifestations. 123 (44%) patients died at the time of the catastrophic APS event but the higher recovery rate was achieved by the combination of anticoagulants plus corticosteroids plus plasma exchange (PE) and/or intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) (69% versus 54%).

Conclusions

The catastrophic APS is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening condition that needs high clinical awareness. The therapeutical connotation is that this may be corrected with the combination of anticoagulation plus steroids plus attempts at achieving a prompt reduction of antiphospholipid antibody titer (i.e. PE and/or IVIG).

Introduction

The descriptive adjective “catastrophic” was added to the term antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) by Asherson [1] in order to highlight an accelerated form of this syndrome resulting in multi-organ failure. Patients with catastrophic APS (currently also known as Asherson's syndrome) [2] have in common: a) clinical evidence of multiple organ involvement developing over a very short period of time; b) histopathological evidence of multiple small vessel occlusions, and c) laboratory confirmation of the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), usually in high titer. Furthermore, the majority of the catastrophic episodes are preceded by a precipitating event, mainly infections [3], [4].

Although less than 1% of patients with the APS develop this complication [5], its potentially lethal outcome emphasizes its importance in clinical medicine today. The majority of patients with catastrophic APS end up in Intensive Care Units (ICU) with multi-organ failure and, unless the condition is considered in the differential diagnosis by attending physicians, it may be completely missed, resulting in a disastrous outcome for these patients [6].

The rarity of this syndrome makes it extraordinarily difficult to study in any systematic way. In order to compile all the published case reports as well as newly diagnosed cases from all over the world, an international registry of patients with catastrophic APS (“CAPS Registry”) was created in 2000 by the European Forum on Antiphospholipid Antibodies, a study group devoted to the development of multicenter projects with large populations of APS patients [7]. This registry can be freely consulted through Internet at www.med.ub.es/MIMMUN/FORUM/CAPS.HTM. The initial analysis of this registry allowed the first characterization of the clinical and laboratory features of the catastrophic APS [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] as well as the establishment of preliminary criteria for its classification and guidelines for its management [14], [15].

Currently, the CAPS Registry documents the entire clinical, laboratory and therapeutic data of 280 patients whose data have been fully registered. In the present study, we describe the clinical and laboratory features, as well as the precipitating factors, treatment and outcome of these 280 patients with catastrophic APS.

Section snippets

Methods

We analyzed the case reports included in the website based international registry of patients with catastrophic APS (CAPS Registry) until September 2008. It contains clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic data on all reported cases of catastrophic APS. The sources of information are the personal communications of the physicians who treated these patients and the periodically computer-search assisted (Medline) of published reports to locate all cases of patients with catastrophic APS. We

General characteristics

The entire series includes 201 (72%) female and 79 (28%) male patients with a mean age of 37 ± 14 years (range, 11–60 years). A total of 129 (46%) patients suffered from primary APS, 112 (40%) from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 14 (5%) from lupus-like disease, and 25 (9%) from other autoimmune diseases. The catastrophic episode was the first manifestation of the APS in 129 (46%) patients.

Precipitating factors and clinical presentation

The main precipitating factors and clinical features of the 280 patients with catastrophic APS from the

Discussion

In 1992, an attempt to single out a seemingly different and important group of patients was adopted by introducing the term catastrophic APS to describe their potentially life-threatening clinical course [1]. From the current review of the 280 patients from the CAPS Registry, certain differences which appear to distinguish this minority group of patients suffering from catastrophic APS from the overwhelming majority of APS patients have been confirmed. The major differences are that large

References (44)

  • P.L. Meroni

    Pathogenesis of the antiphospholipid syndrome: an additional example of the mosaic of autoimmunity

    J Autoimmun

    (2008)
  • L. Andreoli et al.

    J Autoimmun

    (2008)
  • G.R. Hughes

    Hughes syndrome (the antiphospholipid syndrome): ten clinical lessons

    Autoimmun Rev

    (2008)
  • R.A. Asherson et al.

    Microvascular and microangiopathic antiphospholipid-associated syndromes (“MAPS”): semantic or antisemantic?

    Autoimmun Rev

    (2008)
  • Y. Shoenfeld et al.

    Autoantibody explosion in antiphospholipid syndrome

    J Autoimmun

    (2008)
  • N. Bassi et al.

    OxLDL/beta2GPI-anti-oxLDL/beta2GPI complex and atherosclerosis in SLE patients

    Autoimmun Rev

    (2007)
  • C.C. Belizna et al.

    Insights into atherosclerosis therapy in antiphospholipid syndrome

    Autoimmun Rev

    (2007)
  • R.A. Asherson

    The catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome

    J Rheumatol

    (1992)
  • J.C. Piette et al.

    The catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome – Asherson's syndrome

    Ann Med Intern

    (2003)
  • R.A. Asherson et al.

    Catastrophic antibody syndrome. Clinical and laboratory features of 50 patients

    Medicine (Baltimore)

    (1998)
  • R.A. Asherson et al.

    Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome: clues to the pathogenesis from a series of 80 patients

    Medicine (Baltimore)

    (2001)
  • R. Cervera et al.

    Antiphospholipid syndrome: clinical and immunologic manifestations and patterns of disease expression in a cohort of 1000 patients

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2002)
  • Cited by (283)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    See complete list of members of the CAPS Registry at the end of the article

    View full text