Factors related to severe uveitis at diagnosis in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a screening program

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00225-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

To identify factors associated with severe uveitis at diagnosis of eye disease in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who were observed in a screening program, and to identify temporal changes in findings associated with screening during the period 1986 to 2000.

Design

Case control study.

Methods

Uveitis was defined as being severe at diagnosis if there were associated synechiae, cataracts, or retinal edema. Clinical factors for all patients undergoing screening for JIA-associated uveitis from 1986 to 2000 at one institution were studied retrospectively. Children with severe uveitis at diagnosis (cases) were compared with those with mild uveitis at diagnosis and those who never developed uveitis during follow-up in the screening program (controls).

Results

Severe uveitis was present at diagnosis in 22 (5.4%) of 409 patients. Male patients were more likely to have severe uveitis at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 3.7 [95% confidence interval 1.3 to 10.7], P = .014). A longer interval from the onset of arthritis symptoms to the diagnosis of uveitis was associated with a reduced risk of severe uveitis at diagnosis (OR 0.95 [0.91 to 1.0], P = .044). There was no difference in the frequency of severe uveitis at diagnosis between two screening periods: 1986 to 1993 (before American screening guidelines were published) and 1994 to 2000.

Conclusions

Male children are more likely than female children to have severe uveitis at diagnosis. The proportion of children with severe uveitis at diagnosis has not changed since current screening guidelines have been widely publicized, suggesting the need for refinements in screening procedures to target high-risk children with increased surveillance.

Section snippets

Design

A retrospective case control study was performed of patients with JIA who were followed up for uveitis in a screening program at one institution. Cases were patients who were found to have severe uveitis at the diagnosis of eye disease. Controls were patients with either mild uveitis at diagnosis of eye disease or those with no signs of uveitis during their periods of follow-up. A comparison of the patient characteristics was made between two time periods to determine any temporal changes.

Methods

We studied patients with JIA whose onset of arthritis occurred between 1986 and 2000, and who underwent slit-lamp biomicroscopic examination at their initial visits to Great Ormond Street Hospital as part of their rheumatological assessments. Patients were excluded from the study if they had the following JIA subtypes for which prolonged ophthalmic screening has not been recommended: systemic-onset JIA, enthesis-related arthritis, or seropositive juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Also excluded

Results

A total of 409 patients were included in this study. Five patients who presented with uveitis during the period of study, and were subsequently diagnosed with definite JIA, were not included. No patients are known to have developed uveitis after the recommended screening periods. Characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. The oldest age at which arthritis began in patients who subsequently developed uveitis was 121 months. Uveitis was diagnosed before the final follow-up

Discussion

Screening, or more accurately case finding, for uveitis among patients with JIA is clinically sensible, but its efficacy in reducing vision loss is unknown. Children do not report early symptoms of uveitis, and parents will only notice signs of severe disease. Regular slit-lamp biomicroscopic examinations should identify some children before the development of irreversible structural damage, and it is hoped that the prompt initiation of treatment will improve their long-term outcomes, thereby

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

InternetAdvance Publication at ajo.com April 17, 2003.

View full text