Abstract
Objective
Performance measures provide important information, but the meaning of change in these measures is not well known. The purpose of this research is to 1) examine the effect of treatment assignment on the relationship between self-report and performance; 2) to estimate the magnitude of meaningful change in 400- meter walk time (400MWT), 4-meter gait speed (4MGS), and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and 3) to evaluate the effect of direction of change on estimates of magnitude.
Design
This is a secondary analysis of data from the LIFE-P study, a single blinded randomized clinical trial. Using change over one year, we applied distribution-based and anchor-based methods for self-reported mobility to estimate minimally important and substantial change in 400MWT, 4MGS and SPPB.
Setting
Four university-based clinical research sites.
Participants
Sedentary adults aged 70–89 whose SPPB scores were less than 10 and who were able to complete a 400MW at baseline (n=424).
Interventions
A structured exercise program versus health education.
Measurements
400MWT, 4MGS, SPPB.
Results
Relationships between self-report and performance measures were consistent between treatment arms. Minimally significant change estimates were 400MWT: 20–30 seconds, 4MGS: 0.03–0.05m/s and SPPB: 0.3–0.8 points. Substantial changes were 400MWT: 50–60 seconds, 4MGS: 0.08m/s, SPPB: 0.4–1.5 points. Magnitudes of change for improvement and decline were not significantly different.
Conclusions
The magnitude of clinically important change in physical performance measures is reasonably consistent using several analytic techniques and appears to be achievable in clinical trials of exercise. Due to limited power, the effect of direction of change on estimates of magnitude remains uncertain.
