Skip to main content
Log in

Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing recognition of the patient perspective and, more specifically, functioning and health, has led to an impressive effort in research to develop concepts and instruments to measure them. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) represent two different perspectives from which to look at functioning and health. Therefore, it is expected that both will often be used concurrently in clinical practice, research and health reporting. The objective of our study was to examine the relationship between six HRQOL instruments (the SF-36, the NHP, the QL-I, the WHOQOL-BREF, the WHODASII and the EQ-5D) and the ICF. All six HRQOL instruments were linked to the ICF separately by two trained health professionals according to ten linking rules developed specifically for this purpose. The degree of agreement between health professionals was calculated by means of the kappa statistic. Bootstrapped confidence intervals were calculated. In the 148 items of the 6 instruments a total of 226 concepts were identified and linked to the ICF. The estimated kappa coefficients range between 0.82 and 0.98. The concepts contained in the items of the HRQOL instruments were linked to 91 different ICF categories, 17 categories of the component body functions, 60 categories of the component activities and participation, and 14 categories of the component environmental factors. Twelve concepts could not be linked to the ICF at all. In the component body functions, only emotional functions are covered by all examined instruments. In the component activities and participation, all instruments cover aspects of work, but the half of them scarcely cover aspects of mobility. Only four of the six instruments address environmental factors. The ICF proved highly useful for the comparison of HRQOL instruments. The comparison of selected HRQOL instruments may provide clinicians and researchers with new insights when selecting health-status measures for clinical studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spilker B. Introduction. In: Spilker B. (ed), Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical trials, 2nd ed, Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996; 1–10.

  2. JE Ware CD Sherbourne (1992) ArticleTitleThe MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). A. Conceptual framework and item selection Medical Care 30 473–483 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 Occurrence Handle1593914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. SM Hunt J McEwen SP McKenna (1985) ArticleTitleMeasuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists J R Coll Gen Pract 35 IssueID273 185–188 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2M7osFektA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle3989783 Occurrence Handle1960139

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODASII). Training Manual: a guide to administration. Geneva: WHO (2000) Retrieved April 9, 2003, from <http://www.who.int/icidh/whodas/>.

  5. InstitutionalAuthorNameThe Euroqol Group (1990) ArticleTitleEuroqol-a facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life Health Policy 16 199–208 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. InstitutionalAuthorNameWorld Health Organization (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health WHO ICF. Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  7. G Stucki A Cieza T Ewert N Kostanjsek S Chatterji TB Uestuen (2002) ArticleTitleApplication of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice Disability and Rehabilitation 24 IssueID5 281–282 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383msFOgug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1080/09638280110105222 Occurrence Handle12004974

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. A Cieza T Brockow T Ewert E Amman B Kollerits S Chatterji B Bedirhan Üstün G Stucki (2002) ArticleTitleLinking Health-Status measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health J Rehabil Med 34 1–6 Occurrence Handle10.1080/165019702760279189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. InstitutionalAuthorNameWorld Health Organization (1980) International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps: ICIDH WHO Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  10. G Stucki T Ewert A Cieza (2002) ArticleTitleValue and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine Disability and Rehabili tation 24 IssueID17 932–938 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2Fhs1GktQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1080/09638280210148594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. PJ Doyle (2002) ArticleTitleMeasuring health outcomes in stroke survivors Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83 IssueID12 Suppl 2 S39–S43 Occurrence Handle10.1053/apmr.2002.36838 Occurrence Handle12474170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. RH Harwood P Gompertz S Ebrahim (1994) ArticleTitleHandicap one year after a stroke: validity of a new scale J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 57 IssueID7 825–829 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c3pt12qug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1136/jnnp.57.7.825 Occurrence Handle7880230 Occurrence Handle1073023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. WO Spitzer AJ Dobson J Hall et al. (1981) ArticleTitleMeasuring the quality of life of cancer patients: A concise QL-index for use by physicians J Chronic Dis 34 IssueID12 585–597 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL38%2Fns1Slug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/0021-9681(81)90058-8 Occurrence Handle7309824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. The WHOQOL Group The development of the World Health Organization quality of life assessment instrument (the WHOQOL). In: Orley J and Kuyken W (eds), Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag ,1994.

  15. A Williams (1995) The measurement and valuation of health: a chronicle University of York York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brook R with the EuroQol group. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 37: 53–72; Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997; 35: 1095–108.

  17. J Cohen (1960) ArticleTitleA coefficient of agreement for nominal scales Educ Psychol Meas 20 37–46 Occurrence Handle10.1177/001316446002000104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vierkant RA (2000). A SAS macro for calculating bootstrapped confidence intervals about a kappa coefficient. SAS Users Group International Online Proceedings. Retrieved July 23, 2004, from <http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi22/STATS/PAPER295.PDF>.

  19. M Weigl A Cieza M Harder S Geyh E Amann N Kostanjsek G Stucki (2003) ArticleTitleLinking osteoarthritis-specific health-status measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Osteoarthritis Cartilage 11 IssueID7 519–523 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3ovVaitg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1063-4584(03)00086-4 Occurrence Handle12814615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. RC Kessler DK Mroczek (1995) ArticleTitleMeasuring the effects of medical interventions Med Care 33 IssueID4 109–119

    Google Scholar 

  21. CA McHorney (1997) ArticleTitleGeneric health measurement: Past accomplishments and a measurement paradigm for the 21st century Ann Intern Med 15 IssueID27 743–750 Occurrence Handle10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_Part_2-199710151-00061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M Waltz W Kriegel P van’tPad Bosch (1998) ArticleTitleThe social environment and health in rheumatoid arthritis: Marital quality predicts individual variability in pain severity Arthritis Care Res 11 356–374 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FkvVGksA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/art.1790110507 Occurrence Handle9830880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. J Kirwan T Heiberg S Hewlett et al. (2003) ArticleTitleOutcomes from the Patient Perspective Workshop at OMERACT 6 J Rheumatol 30 IssueID4 868–872 Occurrence Handle12672218

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. U Johansson B Bernspang (2003) ArticleTitleLife satisfaction related to work re-entry after brain injury: A longitudinal study Brain Inj 17 IssueID11 991–1002 Occurrence Handle10.1080/0269905031000110508 Occurrence Handle14514450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. M Vestling B Tufvesson S Iwarsson (2003) ArticleTitleIndicators for return to work after stroke and the importance of work for subjective well-being and life satisfaction J Rehabil Med 35 IssueID3 127–131 Occurrence Handle10.1080/16501970310010475 Occurrence Handle12809195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. K Avlund R Lund BE Holstein P Due (2004) ArticleTitleSocial relations as determinant of onset of disability in aging Arch Gerontol Geriatr 38 IssueID1 85–99 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.archger.2003.08.003 Occurrence Handle14599708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. LA Travis JM Lyness CG Shields DA King C Cox (2004) ArticleTitleSocial support, depression, and functional disability in older adult primary-care patients Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 12 IssueID3 265–271 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00019442-200405000-00005 Occurrence Handle15126227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerold Stucki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cieza, A., Stucki, G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Qual Life Res 14, 1225–1237 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-4773-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-4773-0

Keywords

Navigation