Abstract
Quality in health care has traditionally been dominated by medical profession, where patients’ opinions were labelled as lay evaluation. Patients’ views and opinions are important because they give us an insight into dimensions of quality that are not evaluated by medical profession and often seem to be more important. In health care quantitative methodology is often used to address these quality dimensions and introduce patients’ views and opinions. There are various benefits using quantitative research instruments, such as a detailed analysis of the importance of various quality dimensions for patients and an analysis of factors influencing patients’ satisfaction. On the other hand serious deficiencies can be tackled too, that are usually dealt with qualitative research instruments, because they go deeper into people’s motives and feelings. However, health care service is specific—it is very important to patients (health is one of the most important values), but their participation in health care service is rather low. They also don’t always say and do what they mean. In such a context combination of quantitative and qualitative research instrument does not give satisfactory answers. The importance of complaints is stressed and rewards for taking them seriously and acting upon them is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bengtsson S.: Quality by users’ influence and involvement in Denmark—the logical development of social services. In: Evers, A., Haverinen, R., Leichsenring, K., Wistow, G. (eds) Developing Quality in Personal Social Services; Concepts, Cases and Comments, pp. 201–214. Ashgate/European Centre, Vienna (1997)
Bergman B., Klefsjö B.: Quality; from Customer Needs to Customer Satisfaction. McGraw Hill Book Company, London (1994)
Berry L.L., Parasuraman A.: Marketing Services Competing Through Quality. The Free Press, A Division of Macmillan, Inc., New York (1991)
Dowing M.: Measuring quality in personal social services. In: Evers, A., Haverinen, R., Leichsenring, K., Wistow, G. (eds) Developing Quality in Personal Social Services; Concepts, Cases and Comments, pp. 95–108. Ashgate/European Centre, Vienna (1997)
Družina umrlega 12-letnika zaradi malomarnosti ovadila zdravnike. Slovenija—zdravje 26 Nov 2008. http://www.siol.net/slovenija/zdravje/2008/11/zaradi_malomarnosti_ovadili_zdravnike.aspx (2011). Accessed 22 May 2011
Fras Z., Pajntar M.: Kako merimo kakovost zdravstvenega varstva. Zdravniški vestnik 71(12), 737–741 (2002)
Göb R., McCollin C., Ramalhoto M.F.: Ordinal methodology in the analysis of Likert scales. Qual. Quant. 41, 601–626 (2007)
Goričan, A.: Zadovoljstvo uporabnikov zdravstvenih storitev z delom zdravstvenega osebja: študija primera: magistrska naloga. Univerza na primorskem, Fakulteta za management v Kopru (2009)
Hirschman A.O.: Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Response to Decline in Firms, Organisations and States. Howard University Press, Cambridge (1970)
Kersnik J.: Zadovoljstvo bolnikom z zdravnikom družinske medicine. Doktorska disertacija, Medicinska fakulteta, Ljubljana (2011)
Kersnik, J.: Kakovost v sistemu zdravstvenega varstva v Republiki Sloveniji—pregled stanja. Ministrtvo za zdravje. Urad SZO. http://www.drmed.org/projekt_kakovost/Porocilo_za_WHO_3.doc (2011). Accessed 5 May 2011
Kumar R.: Reserch Methodology. A Step by Step Guide for Beginners. Sage Publications, London (2005)
Kutin B., Dovjak Plešej M., Macur M., Zore L., But D.: Pritožni postopki kot mehanizem uveljavljanja pravic zavarovanih oseb v institucijah zdravstvenega varstva. Research report. Zveza Potrošnikov Slovenije, Ljubljana (2001)
Lariot N.: Krik (Grasset et Fasquelle). Prešernova družba, Ljubljana (1978)
Macur M.: Vpliv privatizacije na kakovost zdravstvenih storitev—evalvacija z vidika uporabnika. Doktorska disertacija, Fakulteta za družbene vede, Ljubljana (2000)
Oppen M.: Towards a new client orientation through continuous improvement. In: Evers, A., Haverinen, R., Leichsenring, K., Wistow, G. (eds) Developing Quality in Personal Social Services; Concepts, Cases and Comments, pp. 109–126. Ashgate/European Centre, Vienna (1997)
Pestoff, V.A.: Citizens as co-producers of social services in Europe. From the welfare state to the welfare mix. Stockholm University, School of Business, Research Report (1995)
Pfeffer, N., Coote, A.: Is quality good for you?; A critical review of quality assurance in welfare services. Social Policy Paper No. 5, London (1991)
Potočnik V.: Trženje storitev. Gospodarski vestnik, Ljubljana (2000)
Remic M.: Porabnikovo vrednotenje zdravstvenih storitev. Diplomsko delo, Ekonomska fakulteta, Ljubljana (2003)
Rus V., Toš N.: Vrednote Slovencev in Evropejcev: analiza vrednotnih orientacij Slovencev ob koncu stoletja. Fakulteta za družbene vede, Ljubljana (2005)
Sale J.E.M., Lohfeld L.H., Brazil K.: Revisiting the quantitative—qualitative debate: implications for mixed-methods research. Qual. Quant. 36, 43–53 (2002)
Švab, I., Kersnik, J., Berger, T., Rotar-Pavlič, D., Vegnuti, M., Poplas-Sušič, T., Vatovec-Progar, I.: Kakovost dela v osnovni zdravstveni dejavnosti v letu 1997; letno poročilo. Inštitut za varovanje zdravja Republike Slovenije, Ljubljana (1997)
Toš, N., et al.: Slovensko javno mnenje 2001/3: Raziskava o zdravju in zdravstvu IV. in Raziskava o obrambi in varnosti [datoteka podatkov]. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede, Center za raziskovanje javnega mnenja in množičnih komunikacij [izdelava], 2001. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede, Arhiv družboslovnih podatkov [distribucija] (2002)
Uhan S.: Prava in neprava mnenja. Znanstvena knjiznica, Fakulteta za druzbene vede, Ljubljana (1998)
Vidovič D.: Zadovoljstvo bolnikov kot merilo kakovosti v splošni medicini. Prešernova naloga. Medicinska fakulteta, Ljubljana (1998)
WHO: Quality/patient safety. http://www.wpro.who.int/health_topics/quality_patient_safety/ (2011). Accessed 17 May 2011
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Macur, M. Quality in health care: possibilities and limitations of quantitative research instruments among health care users. Qual Quant 47, 1703–1716 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9621-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9621-z