Skip to main content
Log in

What is the Prevalence of Children with Special Health Care Needs? Toward an Understanding of Variations in Findings and Methods Across Three National Surveys

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 14 September 2007

Abstract

Objectives

To compare and consider sources of variation in the prevalence and characteristics of children with special health care needs (CSHCN) identified using the CSHCN Screener across the 2001 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs (NS-CSHCN), the 2003 National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) and the 2001–2004 Medical Expenditures Panel Surveys (MEPS).

Methods

For each survey, national prevalence rates and the demographic, health and health need characteristics of CSHCN age 0–17 years were estimated and compared. The stability of CSHCN state prevalence rankings between the NS-CSHCN and NSCH was assessed. Logistic regression analysis produced adjusted odds of identification for subgroups of children. CSHCN Screener sampling and administration were profiled across eight methodology parameters for each survey.

Results

Compared to the NS-CSHCN (12.8%), CSHCN prevalence for children age 0–17 years was 4.8 points higher for the NSCH (17.6%) and 6.0–6.5 points higher across the four 2001–2004 MEPS datasets (18.8–19.3%). The adjusted probability of identification by child’s demographic characteristics was stable across all datasets as were state prevalence rankings between the NS-CSHCN and the NSCH. CSHCN identified through the NS-CSHCN were slightly more likely to meet more than one CSHCN Screener criteria, to meet the “above routine need or use of services” criterion and to miss two or more weeks of school due to illness compared to the NSCH, suggesting that CSHCN with less complex and/or serious health consequences may not have been as likely to be identified through the NS-CSHCN. CSHCN prevalence did not change significantly between 2001 and 2004 MEPS, although some off-setting increases or decreases in the proportion of CSHCN meeting specific CSHCN Screener criteria occurred and reflects trends toward increased prescription medication use in children.

Conclusions

When CSHCN Screener administration methods remained similar across years (2001–2004 MEPS), CSHCN prevalence rates were stable. When methods varied between surveys, CSHCN prevalence rates differed. These differences suggest that prevalence is best expressed as a range, rather than as a point estimate. However, once identified, characteristics and health needs of CSHCN were stable across surveys evaluated, each of which has unique strengths for purposes of policy and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. However, the opposite is not the case. Prior research indicates that many children with a chronic condition diagnosis code(s) in their records do not experience health and health service need consequences to qualify them as having a special health care need. In this way, the CSCHN Screener places a higher bar on identification than do diagnostic records. It should be noted that children identified by the CSHCN Screener who do not have diagnoses recorded in records often qualify on health and health need consequences suggesting the presence of a mental, emotional or behavioral health problem versus a physical health condition only.

  2. The 2002 National Health Interview Survey also included the CSHCN Screener for a 6-month period. The screener was dropped from subsequent surveys, and due to the limited available data, direct estimates from the NHIS have not been included in this analysis.

  3. A data table summarizing these findings is available upon request.

  4. A report on a study conducted to evaluate the cultural and methodologic explanations for the lower national rate of CSHCN for children with Spanish speaking parents is available [23].

References

  1. McPherson, M., Arango, P., Fox, H., et al. (1998). A new definition of children with special health care needs. Pediatrics, 102, 137–140.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Health Resources and Services Administration (2005). Healthy People 2010: Objective 16; Maternal, infant, and child health [accessed on October 2, 2005]. Available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/Document/HTML/Volume2/16MICH.htm.

  3. New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. (2003). Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America. Final report. DHHS Pub. No. SMA-03–3832. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. http://www.hhs.gov/newfreedom/init.html.

  4. Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP). 2003. Reaching the children: The relationship between Title V and Part C [accessed on October 4th, 2005]. Available at: http://www.amchp.org/policy/RTC.pdf.

  5. Federal Register. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2002). Medicaid program, Medicaid managed care. Final rules, 67(115), 40988–41116.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bethell, C. D., Read, D., Stein, R. E., et al. (2002). Identifying children with special health care needs: Development and evaluation of a short screening instrument. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 2(1), 38–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bethell, C. D., Read, D., Neff, J., et al. (2002). Comparison of the children with special health care needs screener with the questionnaire for identifying children with chronic conditions—Revised. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 1, 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blumberg, S. J., Olson, L., Frankel, M., et al. (2003). Design and operation of the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs 2001. Vital Health Statistics, 1(41).

  9. Blumberg, S. J., Olson, L., Frankel, M., et al. (2005). Design and operation of the National Survey of Children’s Health 2003. Vital Health Statistics, 1(43).

  10. van Dyck, P. C., Kogan, M. D., Heppel, D., et al. (2004). The National Survey of Children’s Health: A new data resource. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 8(3).

  11. van Dyck, P. C., Kogan, M. D., McPherson, M. G., et al. (2004). Prevalence and characteristics of children with special health care needs. Archives Pediatrics Adolescents Medicine, 158, 884–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Agency for Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2004). MEPS HC-060 2001 Full year consolidated data file, April 2004. http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_stats.

  13. Agency for Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2004). MEPS HC-070 2002 Full year consolidated data file, December 2004. http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_stats.

  14. Agency for Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2005). MEPS HC-079 2003 Full year consolidated data file, November 2005. http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_stats.

  15. Agency for Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2006). MEPS HC-089 2004 Full year consolidated data file, October 2006. http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_stats.

  16. Chevarley, F. M. (2005). Utilization and expenditures for children with special health care needs. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Working Paper No. 05010. Available at http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/papers/workingpapers/WP_Feb2005_FMC.pdf.

  17. Davidoff, A. J. (2004). Identifying children with special health care needs in the National Health Interview Survey: A new resource for policy analysis. Health Services Research, 39(1), 53–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stein, R. E.,K., & Silver, E. J. (1999). Operationalizing a conceptually based noncategorical definition. A first look at US children with chronic conditions. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 153, 68–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scherpenzeel, A. (2001). Mode effects in panel surveys: A comparison of CAPI and CATI. Swiss Household Panel, Federal Office of Statistics.

  21. Kasprzyk, D. (2005). Chapter IX, Measurement error in household surveys: sources and measurement. Household sample surveys in developing and transition countries (pp. 171–198). New York: United Nations.

  22. Shenker, N., & Gentleman, J. (2001). On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. The American Statistician, 55(3), August 2001.

  23. Read, D., Bethell, C., Blumberg, S. J., et al. (forthcoming). An evaluation of the linguistic and cultural validity of the Spanish language version of the Children with Special Health Care Needs Screener. Maternal and Child Health Journal.

  24. Cooper, W. O., Hickson, G. B., Fuchs, C., et al. (2004). New users of antipsychotic medications among children enrolled in TennCare. Archives Pediatrics Adolescent Medicine, 158(8), 753–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cox, E. (2003). Patterns of prescription use among commercially insured children. NICHD Colloquia—Scientific issues in implementing Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (BPCA), Bethesda, MD.

  26. Medco Health Solutions, Inc. (2004). Medco study reveals pediatric spending spike on drugs to treat behavioral problems; 77 percent four-year spending rise linked to increased use and medicine costs.

  27. Groves, R. M., Singer, E., & Corning, A. (2000). Leverage-salience theory of survey participation: Description and an illustration. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 299–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Goyder, J. (1987). The silent minority: Nonrespondents on sample surveys. Westview Press, Boulder CO.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Groves, R. M., Presser, S., & Dipko, S. (2004). The role of topic interest in survey participation decisions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 2–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hess, J. M., Pascale, J., Rothgeb, J., et al. (2001). The effects on person-level versus household-level questionnaire design on survey estimates and data quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(4), 574–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Read, D., & Bethell, C. D. (2002). Resource manual for states and managed care organizations to identify adults and children with special health care needs. Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services [accessed on October 4th, 2005]. Available at http://www.cahmi.org.

  32. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau (2004). The National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs Chartbook 2001. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

  33. Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative (CAHMI). (2005). Data Resource Center on Child and Adolescent Health [accessed October 3rd, 2005]. Available at http://www.cshcndata.org and http://www.childhealthdata.org.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina D. Bethell.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0281-5

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bethell, C.D., Read, D., Blumberg, S.J. et al. What is the Prevalence of Children with Special Health Care Needs? Toward an Understanding of Variations in Findings and Methods Across Three National Surveys. Matern Child Health J 12, 1–14 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0220-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0220-5

Keywords

Navigation