Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Should rheumatologists retain ownership of fibromyalgia? A survey of Ontario rheumatologists

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fibromyalgia is a controversial widespread chronic pain disorder that includes a wide constellation of somatic and emotional symptoms. This study surveyed the opinion of Ontario rheumatologists with respect to their beliefs about the nature and management of fibromyalgia. A key objective was to ascertain if rheumatologists should continue to be the main care providers for these patients. A survey comprising 13 questions was sent electronically to all 150 Ontario rheumatologists. The questionnaire was designed to obtain demographic data as well as opinions regarding different aspects of fibromyalgia. Data were analysed descriptively, and comparisons were made using chi-square tests. A total of 80 respondents completed our survey for a completion rate of 53 %. The majority had completed their training in Canada (85 %) and had been practising for more than 15 years (50 %). Key findings were: (1) 71 % believe that rheumatologists should not retain ownership of fibromyalgia, (2) 55 % believe that fibromyalgia is primarily a psychosomatic illness as opposed to a physical illness, (3) 89 % believe that the family physician should be the main care provider for these patients, and (4) rheumatologists who consider fibromyalgia to be a physical illness were also significantly more likely to believe that rheumatologists should retain ownership of this disease (p = 0.023) and were more likely to continue managing these patients in their practice (p = 0.011). The majority of Ontario rheumatologists do not wish to retain ownership of fibromyalgia. However, most of them continue to manage these patients, even though they believe that the family physician should be the main care provider for patients with fibromyalgia. Rheumatologists may be providing care to these patients primarily because this care is not available to them from their primary care physicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wolfe F (2009) Fibromyalgia wars. J Rheumatol 36(4):671–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, Bennett RM, Bombardier C, Goldenberg DL et al (1990) The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia: report of the multicenter criteria committee. Arthritis Rheum 33:160–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carville SF, Arendt-Nielsen S, Bliddal H (2008) EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of fibromyalgia syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 67(4):536–541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Spaeth M, Briley M (2009) Fibromyalgia: a complex syndrome requiring a multidisciplinary approach. Hum Psychopharmacol 24(Suppl 1):S3–S10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shir Y, Fitzcharles M (2009) Should rheumatologists retain ownership of fibromyalgia? J Rheumatol 36:667–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Holman AJ (2002) The value of rheumatologists to patients with fibromyalgia: comment on the presidential address by Weinblatt. Arthritis Rheum 46(12):3390, Author reply

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarkozi J (2009) Fibromyalgia and the fallacy of pain from nowhere. J Rheumatol 36:2836–2837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. www.surveymonkey.com

  9. Fitzcharles MA, Boulos P (2003) Inaccuracy in the diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome: analysis of referrals. Rheumatology (Oxford) 42(2):263–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blotman F, Thomas E, Myon E et al (2005) Awareness and knowledge of fibromyalgia among French rheumatologists and general practitioners. Clin Exp Rheumatol 23(5):697–700

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Ontario Rheumatology Association for the kind assistance in distributing our survey to its members.

Disclosures

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Internal Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada

    Sassan Ghazan-Shahi

  2. Medicine (Rheumatology), Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada

    Tanveer Towheed

  3. Clinical Research Centre, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Canada

    Wilma Hopman

  4. Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada

    Wilma Hopman

  5. Department of Medicine, Kingston General Hospital, Etherington Hall, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, Canada, K7L 2V7

    Sassan Ghazan-Shahi

Authors
  1. Sassan Ghazan-Shahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tanveer Towheed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wilma Hopman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sassan Ghazan-Shahi.

Additional information

Financial support or other benefits are from commercial sources.

Appendix—Survey questionnaire sent via email to the Ontario rheumatologists

Appendix—Survey questionnaire sent via email to the Ontario rheumatologists

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghazan-Shahi, S., Towheed, T. & Hopman, W. Should rheumatologists retain ownership of fibromyalgia? A survey of Ontario rheumatologists. Clin Rheumatol 31, 1177–1181 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-012-1989-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-012-1989-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation