Skip to main content
Log in

Decreased Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-2/Matrix Metalloproteinase Ratio in the Acute Phase of Aortic Dissection

  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Purpose

Aortic dissection is characterized by fragility of the tunica media, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are enzymes that degrade the extracellular matrix of the aorta. This study examines MMPs in patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD) in an attempt to elucidate the mechanisms of their actions.

Methods

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to measure the quantification of MMP-2, MMP-9, and the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-2 in 30 patients with AAD, 12 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and 16 control (CON) patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting.

Results

MMP-2 and TIMP-2 were significantly lower in the AAD group than in the CON group, at 36 ± 19 vs 58 ± 30 (P ≪ 0.01) and at 21 ± 25 vs 216 ± 130 (P ≪ 0.001), respectively. The TIMP-2/MMP-2 ratio was 3.7 ± 1.7 in the CON group and 0.9 ± 0.8 in the AAD group (P ≪ 0.001 vs CON), and the TIMP-2/MMP-9 ratio was 200 ± 170 in the CON group and 37 ± 80 in the AAD group (P ≪ 0.001 vs CON).

Conclusion

Low TIMP-2/MMP-2 and TIMP-2/MMP-9 ratios might play an important role in the onset of aortic dissection, when the tunica media becomes fragile with chronic breakage and degradation of the extracellular matrix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manabe, T., Imoto, K., Uchida, K. et al. Decreased Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-2/Matrix Metalloproteinase Ratio in the Acute Phase of Aortic Dissection. Surg Today 34, 220–225 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-003-2683-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-003-2683-3

Key words

Navigation