Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical evaluation during the acute exacerbation of knee osteoarthritis: the impact of diagnostic ultrasonography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aimed to investigate (1) the probable correlation between clinical and ultrasonographic findings in chronic painful primary knee OA patients referred with acute flare-ups and (2) the impact of diagnostic ultrasonography (US) to determine the real source of pain in these patients. We included 100 patients consecutively who were admitted to our outpatient unit with a pain complaint on a single knee with the diagnosis of primary knee OA according to the ACR criteria. The control group consisted of the patients with pain-free knees at least during the last month, who were already included in the study group. The sonographic evaluation of the knee was performed by a physician who was blinded to the clinical evaluation and/or the physical and radiological evaluations. In the present study, sonographic findings were significantly more observed on the painful knees (p < 0.001). The most commonly encountered findings on the symptomatic knees were the suprapatellar effusion (55 %), the baker cyst (25 %), and the pes anserine bursitis. The distribution of the findings on the asymptomatic knees was as follows: 22 %, the suprapatellar effusion and 5 %, the Baker cyst. Effusion was detected in 55 % of the painful knees of our patients with knee OA. This finding was statistically significant compared to the painless knees of the subjects included. The results of our study also showed that there was a significant relation between the Kellgren–Lawrence grading and the frequency of suprapatellar effusion on US examination (p = 0.026). It was concluded that in chronic, primary, painful knee osteoarthritis, US is a valuable diagnostic method in the confirmation of synovitis and/or the inflammatory episode in spite of the absence of obvious clinical parameters. In advanced osteoarthritis, when we consider that the inflammatory episodes are expected findings, the early confirmation of the inflammation on US may be particularly valuable in the clinical setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES): Osteoarthritis Section (1996) Recommendations for the registration of drugs used in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 55:552–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellamy N, Kirwan J, Boers M, Brooks P, Strand V, Tugwell P, Altman R, Brandt K, Dougados M, Lequesne M (1997) Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III. J Rheumatol 24:799–802

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ayral X, Pickering EH, Woodworth TG, Mackillop N, Dougados M (2005) Synovitis: a potential predictive factor of structural progression of medial tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis e results of a 1 year longitudinal arthroscopic study in 422 patients. Osteo Arthr Cartil 13:361–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dieppe P, Cushnaghan J, Youngen P, Kirwan J (1993) Prediction of the progression of joint space narrowing in osteoarthritis of the knee by bone scintigraphy. Ann Rheum Dis 52:557–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Walther M, Harms H, Krenn V, Radke S, Faehndrich TP, Gohlke F (2001) Correlation of power Doppler sonography with vascularity of the synovial tissue of the knee joint in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthr Rheum 44:331–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fiocco U, Cozzi L, Rubaltelli L, Rigon C, De Candia A, Tregnaghi A, Gallo C, Favaro MA, Chieco-Bianchi F, Baldovin M, Todesco S (1996) Long-term sonographic follow-up of rheumatoid and psoriatic proliferative knee joint synovitis. Br J Rheumatol 35:155–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fornage BD (1995) Musculoskeletal ultrasound. Churchill Livingstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Andonopoulos AP, Yarmenitis S, Sfountouris H, Siamplis D, Zervas C, Bounas A (1995) Baker’s cyst in rheumatoid arthritis: an ultrasonographic study with a high resolution technique. Clin Exp Rheumatol 13(5):633–636

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grassi W, Cervini C (1998) Ultrasonography in rheumatology: an evolving technique. Ann Rheum Dis 57:268–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Karim Z, Wakefield RJ, Conaghan PG, Lawson CA, Goh E, Quinn MA, Astin P, O’Connor P, Gibbon WW, Emery P (2001) The impact of ultrasonography on diagnosis and management of patients with musculoskeletal conditions. Arthr Rheum 44:2932–2933

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. D’Agostino MA, Conaghan P, Le Bars M, Baron G, Grassi W, Martin-Mola E, Wakefield R, Brasseur JL, So A, Backhaus M, Malaise M, Burmester G, Schmidely N, Ravaud P, Dougados M, Emery P (2005) EULAR report on the use of ultrasonography in painful knee osteoarthritis. Part 1: prevalence of inflammation in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 64:1703–1709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kane D, Balint PV, Sturrock RD (2003) Ultrasonography is superior to clinical examination in the detection and localization of knee joint effusion in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 30(5):966–971

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmidt WA, Schmidt H, Schicke B, Gromnica-Ihle E (2004) Standard reference values for musculoskeletal ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis 63:988–994

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kristoffersen H, Torp-Pedersen S, Terslev L, Qvistgaard E, Holm CC, Ellegaard K, Bliddal H (2006) Indications of inflammation visualized by ultrasound in osteoarthritis of the knee. Acta Radiol 47(3):281–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rubaltelli L, Fiocco U, Cozzi L, Baldovin M, Rigon C, Bortoletto P, Tregnaghi A, Melanotte PL, di Maggio C, Todesco S (1992) Prospective sonographic and arthroscopic evaluation of proliferative knee joint synovitis. J Ultrasound Med 13(11):855–862

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tüzün EH, Eker L, Aytar A, Daşkapan A, Bayramoğlu M (2006) Acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Osteoarthr Cartil 13(1):28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mendieta de Miguel E, Cobo Ibáñez T, Usón Jaeger J, Bonilla Hernán G, Martín Mola E (2006) Clinical and ultrasonographic findings related to knee pain in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 14(6):540–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang B, Du JY, Liu JR, Luo HC, Huang JH (1994) Sonographic diagnosis of the knee effusion. J Tongji Med Univ 14(2):105–109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Delaunoy I, Feipel V, Appelboom T, Hauzeur JP (2003) Sonography detection threshold for knee effusion. Clin Rheumatol 22(6):391–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hall FM, Joffe N (1988) CT imaging of the anserine bursa. AJR Am J Roentgenol 150(5):1107–1108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brys P, Velghe B, Geusens E, Bellemans J, Lateur L, Baert AL (1996) Ultrasonography of the knee. J Belge Radiol 79(4):155–159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee MJ, Chow K (2007) Ultrasound of the knee. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 11(2):137–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Grobbelaar N, Bouffard JA (2000) Sonography of the knee, a pictorial review. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 21(3):231–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Theodorou DJ, Theodorou SJ, Fithian DC, Paxton L, Garelick DH, Resnick D (2005) Posterolateral complex knee injuries: 7 injuries magnetic resonance imaging with surgical correlation. Acta Radiol 46:297–305

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lee J, Papakonstantinou O, Brookenthal KR, Trudell D, Resnick DL (2003) Arcuate sign of posterolateral knee injuries: anatomic, radiographic, and MR imaging data related to patterns of injury. Skeletal Radiol 32:619–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Munshi M, Pretterklieber ML, Kwak S, Antonio GE, Trudell DJ, Resnick D (2003) MR imaging, MR arthrography, and specimen correlation of the posterolateral corner of the knee: an anatomic study. AJR 180:1095–1101

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yu JS, Salonen DC, Hodler J, Haghighi P, Trudell D, Resnick D (1996) Posterolateral aspect of the knee: improved MR imaging with a coronal oblique technique. Radiology 198:199–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rajeswaran G, Lee J, Healy J (2007) MRI of the popliteofibular ligament: isotropic 3D WE-DESS versus coronal oblique fat-suppressed T2W MRI. Skeletal Radiol 36:1141–1146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Barker RP, Lee JC, Healy JC (2009) Normal Sonographic anatomy of the posterolateral corner of the knee. AJR 192:73–79

    Google Scholar 

  30. Keen HI, Brown AK, Wakefield RJ, Conaghan PG (2005) Update on musculoskeletal ultrasonography. J R Coll Phys Edimb 35:345–349

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selma Eşen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eşen, S., Akarırmak, Ü., Aydın, F.Y. et al. Clinical evaluation during the acute exacerbation of knee osteoarthritis: the impact of diagnostic ultrasonography. Rheumatol Int 33, 711–717 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-012-2441-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-012-2441-1

Keywords

Navigation