Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biologicals in rheumatology: Austrian experiences from a rheumatic outpatient clinic

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficacy of biological agents has been shown in several randomized clinical trials. However, little is known regarding the performance of these drugs in daily rheumatological care. Totally, 173 patients treated with biological agents (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, anakinra) were retrospectively analyzed between November 2001 and December 2005 at an Austrian rheumatic outpatient clinic. In total, 224 courses of treatment with biological agents were followed up. Among the 93 drug discontinuations observed, the most frequent causes were inefficacy (56.5%) and side effects (31.9%). In 74 patients (51%), the first biological agent was withdrawn after a median treatment period of 10.7 (range 0–80) months. A second biological agent was given to 36 patients, a third to 11 and a fourth to 3 patients. Our data underline the necessity of large observational studies to assess the full spectrum of patients treated with biological agents in clinical routine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Listing J, Strangfeld A, Rau R, Kekow J, Gromnica-Ihle E, Klopsch T, Demary W, Burmester GR, Zink A (2006) Clinical and functional remission: even though biologics are superior to conventional DMARDs overall success rates remain low-results from RABBIT, the German biologics register. Arthritis Res Ther 8:R66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maini R, St Clair EW, Breedveld F, Furst D, Kalden J, Weisman M, Smolen J, Emery P, Harriman G, Feldmann M, Lipsky P (1999) Infliximab (chimeric anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody) versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving concomitant methotrexate: a randomised phase III trial. ATTRACT study group. Lancet 354:1932–1939

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moreland LW, Schiff MH, Baumgartner SW, Tindall EA, Fleischmann RM, Bulpitt KJ, Weaver AL, Keystone EC, Furst DE, Mease PJ, Ruderman EM, Horwitz DA, Arkfeld DG, Garrison L, Burge DJ, Blosch CM, Lange ML, McDonnell ND, Weinblatt ME (1999) Etanercept therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 130:478–486

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. van de Putte LB, Atkins C, Malaise M, Sany J, Russell AS, van Riel PL, Settas L, Bijlsma JW, Todesco S, Dougados M, Nash P, Emery P, Walter N, Kaul M, Fischkoff S, Kupper H (2004) Efficacy and safety of adalimumab as monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis for whom previous disease modifying antirheumatic drug treatment has failed. Ann Rheum Dis 63:508–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen S, Hurd E, Cush J, Schiff M, Weinblatt ME, Moreland LW, Kremer J, Bear MB, Rich WJ, McCabe D (2002) Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with anakinra, a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, in combination with methotrexate: results of a twenty-four-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 46:614–624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weinblatt ME, Keystone EC, Furst DE, Moreland LW, Weisman MH, Birbara CA, Teoh LA, Fischkoff SA, Chartash EK (2003) Adalimumab, a fully human anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients taking concomitant methotrexate: the ARMADA trial. Arthritis Rheum 48:35–45 Erratum in: Arthritis Rheum 48:855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Braun J, Brandt J, Listing J, Zink A, Alten R, Golder W, Gromnica-Ihle E, Kellner H, Krause A, Schneider M, Sörensen H, Zeidler H, Thriene W, Sieper J (2002) Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with infliximab: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 359:1187–1193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Braun J, Brandt J, Listing J, Zink A, Alten R, Burmester G, Gromnica-Ihle E, Kellner H, Schneider M, Sörensen H, Zeidler H, Sieper J (2005) Two year maintenance of efficacy and safety of infliximab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 64:229–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. van der Heijde D, Kivitz A, Schiff MH, Sieper J, Dijkmans BA, Braun J, Dougados M, Reveille JD, Wong RL, Kupper H, Davis JC Jr, ATLAS Study Group (2006) Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 54:2136–2146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brandt J, Khariouzov A, Listing J, Haibel H, Sörensen H, Grassnickel L, Rudwaleit M, Sieper J, Braun J (2003) Six-month results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of etanercept treatment in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 48:1667–1675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Den Bosch F, Kruithof E, Baeten D, Herssens A, de Keyser F, Mielants H, Veys EM (2002) Randomized double-blind comparison of chimeric monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor alpha (infliximab) versus placebo in active spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 46:755–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mease PJ, Goffe BS, Metz J, Vander Stoep A, Finck B, Burge DJ (2000) Etanercept in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: a randomised trial. Lancet 356:385–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Marzo-Ortega H, McGonagle D, O’Connor P, Emery P (2001) Efficacy of etanercept in the treatment of the entheseal pathology in resistant spondylarthropathy: a clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study. Arthritis Rheum 44:2112–2117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Salvarani C, Cantini F, Olivieri I, Macchioni P, Padula A, Niccoli L, Catanoso MG, Scocco GL, Boiardi L (2003) Efficacy of infliximab in resistant psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 49:541–545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Henrickson M, Reiff A (2004) Prolonged efficacy of etanercept in refractory enthesitis-related arthritis. J Rheumatol 31:2055–2061

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Homeff G, Burgos-Vargas R (2002) TNF-alpha antagonists for the treatment of juvenile-onset spondyloarthritides. Clin Exp Rheumatol 20:S137–S142

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sokka T, Pincus T (2003) Eligibility of patients in routine care for major clinical trials of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 48:313–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pincus T, Sokka T, Kavanaugh A (2004) Relative versus absolute goals of therapies for RA: ACR 20 or ACR 50 responses versus target values for “near remission” of DAS or single measures. Clin Exp Rheumatol 22((5 Suppl 35)):S50–S56

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. http://www.rheuma2000.at/html/downloads/richtlinien_basistherapie.pdf

  20. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, Healey LA, Kaplan SR, Liang MH, Luthra HS et al (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A (1984) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 27:361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dougados M, van der Linden S, Juhlin R, Huitfeldt B, Amor B, Calin A, Cats A, Dijkmans B, Olivieri I, Pasero G et al (1991) The European Spondylarthropathy Study Group preliminary criteria for the classification of spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 34:1218–1227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wright V, Moll JMH (1976) Psoriatic arthritis. In: Wright V, Moll JMH (eds) Seronegative polyarthritis. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 169–223

    Google Scholar 

  24. Masi A, Rodnan G, Medsger T (1980) Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Subcommittee for scleroderma criteria of the American Rheumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 23:581–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Willkens RF, Arnett FC, Bitter T, Calin A, Fisher L, Ford DK, Good AE, Masi AT (1981) Reiter’s syndrome. Evaluation of preliminary criteria for definite disease. Arthritis Rheum 24:844–849

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zink A, Listing J, Kary S, Ramlau P, Stoyanova-Scholz M, Babinsky K, von Hinueber U, Gromnica-Ihle E, Wassenberg S, Antoni C, Herzer P, Kekow J, Schneider M, Rau R (2005) Treatment continuation in patients receiving biological agents or conventional DMARD therapy. Ann Rheum Dis 64:1274–1279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Flendrie M, Creemers MC, Welsing PM, den Broeder AA, van Riel PL (2003) Survival during treatment with tumour necrosis factor blocking agents in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 62(Suppl 2):ii30–ii33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lipsky PE, van der Heijde DM, St Clair EW, Furst DE, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, Smolen JS, Weisman M, Emery P, Feldmann M, Harriman GR, Maini RN, Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Trial in Rheumatoid Arthritis with Concomitant Therapy Study Group (2000) Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-tumor necrosis factor trial in rheumatoid arthritis with Concomitant Therapy Study Group. N Engl J Med 343:1594–1602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Klareskog L, van der Heijde D, de Jager JP, Gough A, Kalden J, Malaise M, Martín Mola E, Pavelka K, Sany J, Settas L, Wajdula J, Pedersen R, Fatenejad S, Sanda M, TEMPO (Trial of Etanercept, Methotrexate with Radiographic Patient Outcomes) study investigators (2004) Therapeutic effect of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate compared with each treatment alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363:675–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Furst DE (2004) Observational cohort studies and well controlled clinical trials—we need them both!. J Rheumatol 31:1476–1477

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pincus T, Sokka T (2004) Should contemporary rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials be more like standard patient care and vice versa? Ann Rheum Dis 63(Suppl 2):32–39

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zink A, Strangfeld A, Schneider M, Herzer P, Hierse F, Stoyanova-Scholz M, Wassenberg S, Kapelle A, Listing J (2006) Effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis in an observational cohort study: comparison of patients according to their eligibility for major randomized clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum 54:3399–3407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gomez-Reino JJ, Carmona L, BIOBADASER Group (2006) Switching TNF antagonists in patients with chronic arthritis: an observational study of 488 patients over a four-year period. Arthritis Res Ther 8:R29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Solau-Gervais E, Laxenaire N, Cortet B, Dubucquoi S, Duquesnoy B, Flipo RM (2006) Lack of efficacy of a third tumour necrosis factor alpha antagonist after failure of a soluble receptor and a monoclonal antibody. Rheumatology (Oxford) 45:1121–1124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Carmona L, Gómez-Reino JJ, BIOBADASER Group (2006) Survival of TNF antagonists in spondylarthritis is better than in rheumatoid arthritis. Data from the Spanish registry BIOBADASER. Arthritis Res Ther 8:R72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Strangfeld A, Listing J (2006) Infection and musculoskeletal conditions: bacterial and opportunistic infections during anti-TNF therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 20:1181–1195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bongartz T, Sutton AJ, Sweeting MJ, Buchan I, Matteson EL, Montori V (2006) Anti-TNF antibody therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of serious infections and malignancies: systematic review and meta-analysis of rare harmful effects in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 295:2275–2285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Innsbruck Medical University, the Tyrolean Research Funds (to C. Duftner) and the “Verein zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Ausbildung und Tätigkeit von Südtirolern an der Universität Innsbruck” (to C. Dejaco).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Duftner.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

296_2008_621_MOESM1_ESM.ppt

Number of patients treated with a biological agent with respect to the diagnosis and the year of beginning the treatment. Filled bars represent patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis (n=109), striped bars represent spondyloarthritis patients (n=60) and the open bar is for patients suffering from other chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (n=4) (PPT 24 kb)

Supplementary table (DOC 26 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duftner, C., Dejaco, C., Larcher, H. et al. Biologicals in rheumatology: Austrian experiences from a rheumatic outpatient clinic. Rheumatol Int 29, 69–73 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-008-0621-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-008-0621-9

Keywords

Navigation