Table 3.

Summary of studies directly correlating MRI features with synovial pathobiology: histobiological characteristics.

StudyNo. BiopsiesMacroscopic Assessment of SynoviumRoutine H&E AssessmentIHC AnalysisSynovial Gene Expression AnalysisMain Conclusion
Konig, et al308–12 from different locationsNoGraded into 1 of 3 groups: fibrous, slightly hypervascular, and hypervascularNoNoDC- MRI is able to distinguish joint effusion from hypervascular pannus and to grade the vascularity of synovitis (only descriptive statistics reported)
Tamai, et al211 sample from each of 3 sites (total no. not defined)No8 histological features assessed SQ (0–3) fibrin exudation, PMN cell infiltration, mononuclear cell infiltration, multiplication of synoviocyte lining layer, villous hypertrophy of synovial surface, proliferation of blood vessels, formation of granulation tissue, and fibrosisNoNoRate and degree of signal enhancement with dynamic imaging significantly correlated with histological inflammation (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U)
Gaffney, et al24Not definedNoSQ histological score 0–3, 3 histological features: PMN infiltration, fibrin, and hyperemiaNoNoRate of synovial membrane enhancement correlated with histologic features of acute inflammation (r = 0.63, p < 0.01)
Gaffney, et al25Not definedNoNot assessedEndothelial cell marker (Qbend30) assessed by DIANoGd-DTPA–enhanced MRI correlates with histologically determined synovial vascularity (r = 0.55, p < 0.02)
Ostergaard, et al224 biopsy sites (total no. not defined)SQ macroscopic assessment intra-operatively, 0–39 features: subsynovial infiltration of PMN leukocytes, subsynovial infiltration of mononuclear leukocytes, surface fibrin deposition, multiplication of the synovial lining, villous hypertrophy of synovial surface, proliferation of blood vessels, perivascular edema, formation of granulation tissue, and fibrosis (SQ score 0–3)NoNoMRI-determined synovial volumes are correlated with synovial inflammatory activity (r = 0.55, p < 0.001)
Ostergaard, et al234 biopsy sites (total no. not defined)NoSame as Ostergaard, et al22NoNoEarly enhancement rate of the total synovial membrane was significantly correlated with histologic grade of synovial inflammatory activity (r = 0.73, p < 10−7)
Veale, et al371 biopsy from each site (total no. not defined)Hyperemia (0–1), granulation (0–1), or villous hypertrophy (0–2) + overall impression of the synovial inflammation VAS 0–100 mmLining layer hyperplasia (SQ 0–3)T cells [CD3, CD4 (OKT4), CD8], B cells (CD20), macrophages (CD68), and MHC class II.SQ analysis 0–5NoThe most significant correlations were observed between the MRE at the SPP ROI and arthroscopic VAS for synovitis (r = 0.77, p = 0.003) and between the MRE and immunohistological CD4 score (r = 0.70, p = 0.11)
Ostendorf, et al264–6 biopsies from 2 pts6 variables (extent of synovitis, synovial thickening, hyperemia, proliferation, vascularity, fibrosis) + 1 item each for bony and cartilaginous changes (SQ assessment, 0–3)Synovial hyperplasia, fibrosis, vascularity, lymphocyte and stromal cell infiltration, and fibrin depositionNoNoSynovial enhancement on MRI correlated with miniarthroscopy findings of hyperemia (p = 0.0038), and vascularity (0.0058). Synovial thickening on miniarthroscopy was significantly associated with synovial proliferation on MRI (p = 0.0063). No formal evaluation of microhistological associations reported
Takase, et al27Not definedNoSynovitis score (inflammatory cell infiltrates, synovial lining layer thickness + vascularity), SQ 0–3DIA IHC assessment of sublining macrophages (CD68), cell proliferation (Ki67), and neoangiogenesis (CD31)NoMRI synovitis significantly correlated with total synovitis score (r = 0.48, p < 0.05) and inflammatory cell infiltrates (0.47, p < 0.05)
Axelsen, et al284 (total no. not defined)NoSQ synovitis score (0–3, 9 histological features)NoNoInitial rate of enhancement from the quick ROI and the precise ROI revealed high correlations with the grade of histological inflammation (r = 0.70, p < 0.001 and r = 0.74, p < 0.001, respectively)
Buch, et al336NoNoT cells (CD3, CD154, CD4), APC (CD80, CD86), B cells (CD20, CD79), synovial fibroblasts (CD55), intracellular adhesion molecules (CD54), macrophages (CD68) and CD11b+ neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells. SQ assessment, 0–4, of all variables in lining and subliningqRT-PCR (IL-1, IL-6, MMP-1, MMP-3, IFN-γ)Significant correlation between MRI synovitis scores (initial rate of enhancement and maximum enhancement) and IFN-γ was observed (r = 0.63 and r = 0.79, respectively)
Kirkham, et al383–4 (total no. not defined)NoSQ analysis of lining layer thickness, vascularity, sublining fibrosis, and cellular infiltrates and patterns (perivascular, diffuse, or focal aggregates)NoqRT-PCR IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-16, IL-1β, IL-17, RANKL, and IL-10Histologic features had no relationship to damage progression. mRNA levels of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-17, and IL-10 were predictive of joint damage progression (multivariate regression analysis, r2 = 0.57)
Vordenbäumen, et al316 biopsiesLimited to direction of biopsiesKrenn score39Sublining CD68 scoreNoMaximum enhancement of the MCP significantly correlated with sublining CD68 staining (r = 0.750, p = 0.02) and synovitis score (r = 0.743, p = 0.02)
Vordenbäumen, et al356 biopsiesNoKrenn score39Sublining CD68 score, VEGF, and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α)NoVEGF staining correlated with BME (r = 0.676, p = 0.032) and erosion scores (r = 0.695, p = 0.026) of RAMRIS
Anandarajah, et al32NANoKrenn score39 (modified)NoNoNo statistical correlationbetween synovial scores on MRI and synovial hyperplasia on histology
Paramarta, et al29Assume 6 biopsiesNoNoCD3, CD22, CD68, CD163, vWFNoSignificant association between MRI synovitis and CD68+ sublining macrophage number in RA/SpA (r = 0.686, p = 0.001)
Kennedy, et al34NASynovitis and vascularity (VAS 0–100 mm)Not reportedCD3, CD68, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD19, and factor VIII/αSMANoChange in MRI score after TNF blocking therapy was significantly associated with changes in macroscopic synovitis (p = 0.056), sublining CD68 (p < 0.002), and sublining CD4 cell number (p = 0.032)
Maijer, et al366 biopsiesNoNovWFNoDemonstrates that DCE-MRI pharm. variables differ between different diagnostic categories and correlate with local (synovial vWF) and systemic markers of disease activity
  • MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; IHC: immunohistochemical; NA: not available; SQ: semiquantitative; VAS: visual analog scale; PMN: polymorphonuclear; DIA: digital image analysis; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; vWF: von Willebrand factor; qRT-PCR: quantitative real-time PCR; IL-1: interleukin 1; MMP: matrix metalloprotease; IFN-γ: interferon-γ; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-α; RANKL: receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand; Gd: gadolinium; SPP: suprapatellar pouch; pharm.: pharmacokinetic; ROI: region of interest; MCP: metacarpophalangeal; BME: bone marrow edema; RAMRIS: Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; SpA: spondyloarthritis; DCE: dynamic contrast-enhanced; APC: antigen-presenting cell; HIF: hypoxia-inducible factor; MRE: maximal rate of enhancement.