Table 1.

GRAPPA members’ responses to inclusion of a PsA measure in the CAPP.

Total Respondents per Profession *
QuestionResponseRheumatologist, n (%) 62 (58)Dermatologist, n (%) 23 (22)Other Clinical Roles, n (%) 6 (6)Non-clinician Scientist, n (%) 3 (3)Industry Professional, n (%) 21 (20)Other, n (%) 1 (1)Total, n (%)
1. Should CAPP include a PsA measure?
Yes43 (69)13 (57)6 (100)3 (100)17 (81)1 (100)78 (74)
No19 (31)10 (43)004 (19)028 (26)
2. Should the measure address PsA (present/absent) or measure PsA severity?
PsA present/absent28 (45)5 (22)4 (67)1 (33)10 (48)045 (42)
PsA severity15 (24)9 (39)2 (33)2 (67)5 (24)1 (100)32 (30)
Both5 (8)1 (4)003 (14)08 (8)
Neither14 (23)8 (35)003 (14)021 (20)
3. How should PsA be measured?
Peripheral6 (10)001 (33)5 (24)011 (10)
Axial0000000
Both41 (66)15 (65)6 (100)2 (67)12 (57)1 (100)71 (68)
Neither15 (24)8 (35)003 (14)023 (22)*
  • Respondents claiming multiple professional categories are annotated in all applicable categories.

  • Respondents claiming multiple professional categories are annotated as a single response.

  • One response (“peripheral” and “neither”) was omitted. GRAPPA: Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis; CAPP: Comprehensive Assessment of the Psoriasis Patient; PsA: psoriatic arthritis.