Author, Year | Country* | Source** | Method*** | Relevance# | Field^ | Generalizability∼ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ahmed9, 2010 | USA | Literature | Framework | Direct | Generic | ++ |
Blair10, 2009 | USA | Literature | Literature review | Direct | Geriatric | − |
Boote1, 2006 | UK | Literature | Delphi | Direct | Generic | ++ |
De Wit7, 2011 | EU | Literature | Delphi | Direct | Rheum | + |
Kent11, 2013 | UK | Gray | Checklist | Direct | Generic | + |
Lindenmeyer12, 2007 | UK | Literature | Descriptive | Direct | Diabetes | + |
Marsden13, 2004 | UK | Literature | Descriptive | Direct | Cancer | − |
PCORI5, 2013 | USA | Gray | Framework | Direct | Generic | ++ |
Staniszewska15, 2011 | UK | Literature | Checklist | Direct | Generic | ++ |
Abma16, 2009 | NED | Literature | Descriptive | Indirect | Renal and disability | − |
Caldon17, 2010 | UK | Literature | Descriptive | Indirect | Cancer | + |
Guise18, 2013 | USA | Literature | Descriptive | Indirect | Generic | ++ |
Hewlett19, 2006 | EU | Literature | Descriptive | Indirect | Rheum | + |
Katz20, 2012 | USA | Literature | Survey | Indirect | Cancer | − |
Nierse21, 2012 | NED | Literature | Descriptive | Indirect | Renal | − |
Rhodes22, 2002 | UK | Literature | Descriptive | Indirect | Diabetes | − |
Stevens23, 2003 | UK | Literature | Descriptive | Indirect | Oncology | + |
Wright24, 2010 | UK | Literature | Framework | Indirect | Oncology | + |
↵* Origin of the article.
↵** Where the source was from.
↵*** How the recommendations or guidelines were derived.
↵# Whether the data were directly relevant for recommendations of patient involvement in research or indirectly, i.e., from descriptions or information that may be helpful with recommendations or guidelines.
↵^ The area that the recommendations or data were related to.
↵∼ The extent to which the information can be applied to areas outside the field that the information was related to (global assessment by the authors). EU: Europe; NED: the Netherlands.