Table 2.

Description of core sets developed outside of OMERACT: expert consensus panels.

Generic MethodologyFirst Author/Year/(Reference)Literature Search for All Outcomes Currently UsedExpert Group Consensus
Acute renal failureBellomo R, 2004 (19)Literature search conductedProfessionals discussed the acceptability of various endpoints
Bipolar affective disorderCarlson GA, 2003 (20)Authors held a discussion forum including what should be included in outcome measures. They conclude by selecting a scale as their primary outcome
Breast cancerHudis CA, 2007 (21)Evaluated existing practicesExpert working group (statisticians, oncologists, correlative experts) developed guidelines by consensus
Colon cancerPunt CJ, 2007 (22)Literature search for endpoints conductedExpert panel discussed the endpoints found in the study and recommended 6 endpoints with definitions for each
Fall preventionLamb SE, 2005 (23)Recommendations were generated by international expert consensus in 3 phases. 1. An international meeting of 32 experts in which agreement on the key domains for outcome assessment was secured. 2. Within each domain, systematic literature reviews were used to identify the quality and scope of measures used in clinical trials to date. 3. A further 2-day international meeting in which expert consensus recommendations for outcome measures in each domain were developed
Graft versus host disease (GVHD)Pavletic SZ, 2006 (24, 25)Expert group consensus
Infantile spasmsLux AL, 2004 (26)5-round Delphi was conducted with experts
Prostate cancerScher HI, 2008 (27)New census criteria defined by experts by reviewing the old criteria and based on previous trial data
SepsisGoldstein B, 2005 (28)Expert consensus conference
Smoking cessationWest R, 2005 (29)No clear methodology — however appears to be expert consensus
Spinal disordersBombardier C, 2000 (30)Expert consensus conference