Appendix 2.

Characteristics of arthroplasty trials by journal type and year of publication. Values are n (%)

CharacteristicJournal TypePublication Year
Orthopedics/surgery Journal, n = 125Anesthesia, n = 34Internal Medicine, n = 27Other/Rehab, n = 101997, n = 672006, n = 129
Randomization
  Generation of allocation sequencep = 0.146p = 0.155
    Adequate49 (39)21 (62)11 (41)4 (40)23 (34)62 (48)
    Inadequate13 (10)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)3 (5)10 (8)
    Not reported61 (49)13 (38)16 (59)6 (60)40 (60)56 (43)
  Allocation concealmentp = 0.586p = 0.008
    Adequate42 (34)17 (50)13 (48)4 (40)16 (24)60 (47)
    Inadequate4 (3)1 (3)1 (4)0 (0)2 (3)4 (3)
    Not reported79 (62)16 (47)13 (48)6 (60)49 (73)65 (50)
Intervention reproduciblep = 0.774p = 0.999
  Adequate120 (96)34 (100)26 (96)10 (100)65 (97)125 (97)
  Inadequate5 (4)0 (0)1 (4)0 (0)2 (3)4 (3)
CONSORT diagram reportedp < 0.001p = 0.008
  Adequate3 (3)7 (21)8 (30)2 (20)1 (3)19 (15)
  Not reported122 (97)27 (79)19 (70)8 (80)66 (97)110 (85)
Control interventionp < 0.001p = 0.196
  Placebo11 (9)12 (35)10 (37)3 (30)15 (22)21 (16)
  No placebo114 (91)22 (65)17 (63)7 (70)52 (78)108 (84)
Influence of care provider skillp = 0.766p = 0.432
  Yes2 (2)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (2)
  No123 (98)34 (100)27 (100)10 (100)67 (100)127 (98)
Potential similar placebo effectp = 0.054p < 0.001
  Adequate75 (60)28 (82)18 (67)4 (40)30 (45)95 (74)
  Inadequate8 (6)2 (6)1 (4)1 (10)6 (9)6 (5)
  Not reported*42 (34)4 (12)8 (30)5 (50)31 (46)28 (22)
Blinding
  Patientsp = 0.008p = 0.769
    Adequate26 (21)17 (50)14 (52)3 (30)23 (34)37 (29)
    Inadequate4 (3)3 (9)1 (4)0 (0)2 (3)6 (5)
    Not reported*95 (76)14 (41)12 (44)7 (70)42 (63)86 (67)
  Care providersp < 0.001p = 0.017
    Adequate9 (7)13 (38)9 (33)2 (20)16 (24)17 (13)
    Inadequate84 (67)15 (44)5 (19)2 (20)27 (40)79 (61)
    Not reported32 (26)6 (18)13 (48)6 (60)24 (36)33 (26)
  Outcome assessorsp = 0.168p < 0.001
    Adequate50 (40)18 (53)17 (63)4 (40)32 (48)57 (44)
    Inadequate8 (6)4 (12)0 (0)1 (10)4 (6)9 (7)
    Not reported67 (54)12 (35)10 (37)5 (50)31 (46)63 (49)
Were Adverse Events Reportedp = 0.980p = 0.487
  Adequate70 (56)21 (62)15 (56)5 (50)35 (52)76 (59)
  Inadequate54 (43)13 (38)12 (44)5 (50)32 (48)52 (40)
  Not reported1 (1)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (1)
Sample size justification/power reportedp = 0.110p = 0.013
  Adequate37 (30)17 (50)12 (44)4 (40)16 (24)54 (42)
  Not reported88 (70)17 (50)15 (56)6 (60)51 (76)75 (58)
Statistical Analysisp = 0.061p = 0.935
  Described as ITT or modified ITT8 (6)4 (12)6 (22)2 (20)7 (10)13 (10)
  Not described as ITT or modified ITT117 (94)30 (88)21 (78)8 (80)60 (90)116 (90)
Lost to followup < 20p = 0.129p = 0.435
  Adequate63 (50)19 (56)13 (48)4 (40)30 (45)69 (54)
  Inadequate10 (8)2 (6)7 (26)1 (10)4 (6)16 (12)
  Not reported52 (42)13 (38)7 (26)5 (50)33 (49)44 (34)
  • * Combination of not reported and not applicable. CONSORT: Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials10; ITT: intention to treat.