RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Prevalence and risk factors for urolithiasis in primary gout: is a reappraisal needed?
JF The Journal of Rheumatology
JO J Rheumatol
FD The Journal of Rheumatology
SP 2189
OP 2191
VO 32
IS 11
A1 José Alvarez-Nemegyei
A1 Martha Medina-Escobedo
A1 Salha Villanueva-Jorge
A1 Janitzia Vazquez-Mellado
YR 2005
UL http://www.jrheum.org/content/32/11/2189.abstract
AB OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and risk factors for urolithiasis in primary gout. METHODS: One hundred forty patients with primary gout were studied. Urolithiasis was defined as a history of urolithiasis, or nephrolithiasis detected via ultrasonography in patients with no previous record of urolithiasis. Patient age, duration of gout, presence of tophi, obesity, alcoholism, high blood pressure, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, family history of urolithiasis, daily urine output, uricemia, urine pH, FeNa, FeUrate, urine pH/FeUrate index, and daily urine excretion of urate, sodium, calcium and potassium were compared between lithiasic and non-lithiasic subjects. RESULTS: Fifty-five (39%; 95% CI 31-47) patients had urolithiasis, of which 37 (26%) were diagnosed by clinical history and 18 (13%) by ultrasonography. Patients with a silent kidney stone diagnosed by ultrasound tended to have shorter evolution of gout. Aside from urinary H+ ion concentration (lithiasic subjects 5.17 +/- 3.9 microM/l; non-lithiasic subjects 3.80 +/- 3.01 microM/l; p = 0.02), no difference was found between lithiasic and non-lithiasic subjects for the other variables studied. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography increased the probability of diagnosing urolithiasis by 50%, meaning the prevalence of urolithiasis in gout is likely higher than previously reported. A higher urinary H+ ion concentration was the only variable associated with urolithiasis. Due to advances in diagnosis of gout and urolithiasis, as well as biochemical assays, the prevalence and risk factors for urolithiasis in gout require reassessment.