@article {Toupin-Apriljrheum.141205, author = {Karine Toupin-April and Jennifer Barton and Liana Fraenkel and Linda Li and Viviane Grandpierre and Francis Guillemin and Tamara Rader and Dawn Stacey and France L{\'e}gar{\'e} and Janet Jull and Jennifer Petkovic and Marieke Scholte-Voshaar and Vivian Welch and Anne Lyddiatt and Cathie Hofstetter and Maarten De Wit and Lyn March and Tanya Meade and Robin Christensen and C{\'e}cile Gaujoux-Viala and Maria E. Suarez-Almazor and Annelies Boonen and Christoph Pohl and Richard Martin and Peter S. Tugwell}, title = {Development of a Draft Core Set of Domains for Measuring Shared Decision Making in Osteoarthritis: An OMERACT Working Group on Shared Decision Making}, elocation-id = {jrheum.141205}, year = {2015}, doi = {10.3899/jrheum.141205}, publisher = {The Journal of Rheumatology}, abstract = {Objective Despite the importance of shared decision making for delivering patient-centered care in rheumatology, there is no consensus on how to measure its process and outcomes. The aim of this Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) working group is to determine the core set of domains for measuring shared decision making in intervention studies in adults with osteoarthritis (OA), from the perspectives of patients, health professionals, and researchers. Methods We followed the OMERACT Filter 2.0 method to develop a draft core domain set by (1) forming an OMERACT working group; (2) conducting a review of domains of shared decision making; and (3) obtaining opinions of all those involved using a modified nominal group process held at a session activity at the OMERACT 12 meeting. Results In all, 26 people from Europe, North America, and Australia, including 5 patient research partners, participated in the session activity. Participants identified the following domains for measuring shared decision making to be included as part of the draft core set: (1) identifying the decision, (2) exchanging information, (3) clarifying views, (4) deliberating, (5) making the decision, (6) putting the decision into practice, and (7) assessing the effect of the decision. Contextual factors were also suggested. Conclusion We proposed a draft core set of shared decision-making domains for OA intervention research studies. Next steps include a workshop at OMERACT 13 to reach consensus on these proposed domains in the wider OMERACT group, as well as to detail subdomains and assess instruments to develop a core outcome measurement set.}, issn = {0315-162X}, URL = {https://www.jrheum.org/content/early/2015/04/09/jrheum.141205}, eprint = {https://www.jrheum.org/content/early/2015/04/09/jrheum.141205.full.pdf}, journal = {The Journal of Rheumatology} }