@article {Haquejrheum.090306, author = {Sahena Haque and Caroline Gordon and David Isenberg and Anisur Rahman and Peter Lanyon and Aubrey Bell and Paul Emery and Neil MacHugh and Lee Suan Teh and David G.I. Scott and Mohamed Akil and Sophia Naz and Jacqueline Andrews and Bridget Griffiths and Helen Harris and Hazem Youssef and John McLaren and Veronica Toescu and Vinodh Devakumar and Jamal Teir and Ian N. Bruce}, title = {Risk Factors for Clinical Coronary Heart Disease in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: The Lupus and Atherosclerosis Evaluation of Risk (LASER) Study}, elocation-id = {jrheum.090306}, year = {2009}, doi = {10.3899/jrheum.090306}, publisher = {The Journal of Rheumatology}, abstract = {Objective Accelerated atherosclerosis and premature coronary heart disease (CHD) are recognized complications of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but the exact etiology remains unclear and is likely to be multifactorial. We hypothesized that SLE patients with CHD have increased exposure to traditional risk factors as well as differing disease phenotype and therapy-related factors compared to SLE patients free of CHD. Our aim was to examine risk factors for development of clinical CHD in SLE in the clinical setting. Methods In a UK-wide multicenter retrospective case-control study we recruited 53 SLE patients with verified clinical CHD (myocardial infarction or angina pectoris) and 96 SLE patients without clinical CHD. Controls were recruited from the same center as the case and matched by disease duration. Charts were reviewed up to time of event for cases, or the same {\textquotedblleft}dummy-date{\textquotedblright} in controls. Results SLE patients with clinical CHD were older at the time of event [mean (SD) 53 (10) vs 42 (10) yrs; p \< 0.001], more likely to be male [11 (20\%) vs 3 (7\%); p \< 0.001], and had more exposure to all classic CHD risk factors compared to SLE patients without clinical CHD. They were also more likely to have been treated with corticosteroids (OR 2.46; 95\% CI 1.03, 5.88) and azathioprine (OR 2.33; 95\% CI 1.16, 4.67) and to have evidence of damage on the pre-event SLICC damage index (SDI) (OR 2.20; 95\% CI 1.09, 4.44). There was no difference between groups with regard to clinical organ involvement or autoantibody profile. Conclusion Our study highlights the need for clinical vigilance to identify modifiable risk factors in the clinical setting and in particular with male patients. The pattern of organ involvement did not differ in SLE patients with CHD events. However, the higher pre-event SDI, azathioprine exposure, and pattern of damage items (disease-related rather than therapy-related) in cases suggests that a persistent active lupus phenotype contributes to CHD risk. In this regard, corticosteroids and azathioprine may not control disease well enough to prevent CHD. Clinical trials are needed to determine whether classic risk factor modification will have a role in primary prevention of CHD in SLE patients and whether new therapies that control disease activity can better reduce CHD risk.}, issn = {0315-162X}, URL = {https://www.jrheum.org/content/early/2009/11/25/jrheum.090306}, eprint = {https://www.jrheum.org/content/early/2009/11/25/jrheum.090306.full.pdf}, journal = {The Journal of Rheumatology} }