PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Lorenzo Cavagna
AU  - Roberto Caporali
AU  - Catherine Klersy
AU  - Stefano Ghio
AU  - Riccardo Albertini
AU  - Laura Scelsi
AU  - Remigio Moratti
AU  - Claudia Bonino
AU  - Carlomaurizio Montecucco
TI  - Comparison of Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) and NT-proBNP in Screening for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis
AID  - 10.3899/jrheum.090997
DP  - 2010 Jul 15
TA  - The Journal of Rheumatology
PG  - jrheum.090997
4099  - http://www.jrheum.org/content/early/2010/07/12/jrheum.090997.short
4100  - http://www.jrheum.org/content/early/2010/07/12/jrheum.090997.full
AB  - Objective To compare the performance of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in screening for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods Between January 2008 and March 2009, outpatients referred to our unit and satisfying LeRoy criteria for SSc were assessed for PAH. Doppler echocardiography, BNP measurement, and NT-proBNP measurement were done concomitantly for a complete clinical, instrumental, and biochemical evaluation. Right-heart catheterization was carried out in cases of suspected PAH [estimated pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) ≥ 36 mm Hg; diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) ≤ 50% of predicted value; 1-year DLCO decline ≥ 20% in absence of pulmonary fibrosis; unexplained dyspnea]. Results One hundred thirty-five patients were enrolled (124 women, 11 men; 96 limited SSc, 39 diffuse SSc); precapillary PAH was found in 20 patients (15 limited SSc, 5 diffuse SSc). The estimated PAP correlated with both BNP (R = 0.3; 95% CI 0.14–0.44) and NT-proBNP (R = 0.3, 95% CI 0.14–0.45). BNP [area under the curve (AUC) 0.74, 95% CI 0.59–0.89] was slightly superior to NT-proBNP (AUC 0.63, 95% CI 0.46–0.80) in identification of PAH, with diagnosis cutoff values of 64 pg/ml (sensitivity 60%, specificity 87%) and 239.4 pg/ml (sensitivity 45%, specificity 90%), respectively. BNP (log-transformed, p = 0.032) and creatinine (p = 0.049) were independent predictors of PAH, while NT-proBNP was not (p = 0.50). Conclusion In our single-center study, the performance of BNP was slightly superior to that of NT-proBNP in PAH screening of patients with SSc, although normal levels of these markers do not exclude diagnosis. We observed that impaired renal function is associated with an increased risk of PAH in SSc. Further multicenter studies are needed to confirm our results (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT00617487) .