PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Pia Moinzadeh AU - Gabriela Riemekasten AU - Elise Siegert AU - Gerhard Fierlbeck AU - Joerg Henes AU - Norbert Blank AU - Inga Melchers AU - Ulf Mueller-Ladner AU - Marc Frerix AU - Alexander Kreuter AU - Christian Tigges AU - Nina Lahner AU - Laura Susok AU - Claudia Guenther AU - Gabriele Zeidler AU - Christiane Pfeiffer AU - Margitta Worm AU - Sigrid Karrer AU - Elisabeth Aberer AU - Agnes Bretterklieber AU - Ekkehard Genth AU - Jan C. Simon AU - Joerg H.W. Distler AU - Ruediger Hein AU - Matthias Schneider AU - Cornelia S. Seitz AU - Claudia Herink AU - Kerstin Steinbrink AU - Miklos Sárdy AU - Rita Varga AU - Hartwig Mensing AU - Christian Mensing AU - Percy Lehmann AU - Gunther Neeck AU - Christoph Fiehn AU - Manfred Weber AU - Matthias Goebeler AU - Harald Burkhardt AU - Michael Buslau AU - Keihan Ahmadi-Simab AU - Andrea Himsel AU - Aaron Juche AU - Ina Koetter AU - Annegret Kuhn AU - Michael Sticherling AU - Martin Hellmich AU - Kathrin Kuhr AU - Thomas Krieg AU - Jan Ehrchen AU - Cord Sunderkoetter AU - Nicolas Hunzelmann AU - The German Network for Systemic Scleroderma TI - Vasoactive Therapy in Systemic Sclerosis: Real-life Therapeutic Practice in More Than 3000 Patients AID - 10.3899/jrheum.150382 DP - 2016 Jan 01 TA - The Journal of Rheumatology PG - 66--74 VI - 43 IP - 1 4099 - http://www.jrheum.org/content/43/1/66.short 4100 - http://www.jrheum.org/content/43/1/66.full SO - J Rheumatol2016 Jan 01; 43 AB - Objective. Vasculopathy is a key factor in the pathophysiology of systemic sclerosis (SSc) and the main cause for Raynaud phenomenon (RP), digital ulcers (DU), and/or pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). It is so far unknown how patients with SSc are treated with vasoactive agents in daily practice. To determine to which extent patients with SSc were treated with different vasoactive agents, we used data from the German Network for Systemic Scleroderma registry.Methods. The data of 3248 patients with SSc were analyzed.Results. Patients were treated with vasoactive drugs in 61.1% of cases (1984/3248). Of these, 47.6% received calcium channel inhibitors, followed by 34.2% treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, 21.1% treated with intravenous (IV) prostanoids, 10.1% with pentoxifylline, 8.8% with angiotensin 1 receptor antagonists (AT1RA), 8.7% with endothelin 1 receptor antagonists (ET1RA), 4.1% with phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, and 5.3% with others. Patients with RP received vasoactive therapy in 63.3% of cases, with DU in 70.1%, and with PAH in 78.2% of cases. Logistic regression analysis revealed that patients with PAH were significantly more often treated with PDE5 inhibitors and ET1RA, and those with DU with ET1RA and IV prostanoids. In addition, 41.8% of patients were treated with ACE inhibitors and/or AT1RA. Patients registered after 2009 received significantly more often ET1RA, AT1RA, and IV prostanoids compared with patients registered prior to 2005.Conclusion. These data clearly indicate that many patients with SSc do not yet receive sufficient vasoactive therapy. Further, in recent years, a marked change of treatment regimens can be observed.