PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - TIMOTHY BEUKELMAN
AU  - SARAH RINGOLD
AU  - TREVOR E. DAVIS
AU  - ESI MORGAN DeWITT
AU  - CHRISTINA F. PELAJO
AU  - PAMELA F. WEISS
AU  - YUKIKO KIMURA
TI  - Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drug Use in the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Cross-sectional Analysis of the CARRA Registry
AID  - 10.3899/jrheum.120110
DP  - 2012 Sep 01
TA  - The Journal of Rheumatology
PG  - 1867--1874
VI  - 39
IP  - 9
4099  - http://www.jrheum.org/content/39/9/1867.short
4100  - http://www.jrheum.org/content/39/9/1867.full
SO  - J Rheumatol2012 Sep 01; 39
AB  - Objective. To characterize disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in the United States and to determine patient factors associated with medication use. Methods. We analyzed cross-sectional baseline enrollment data from the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry from May 2010 through May 2011 for children with JIA. Current and prior medication use was included. We used parsimonious backward stepwise logistic regression models to calculate OR to estimate associations between clinical patient factors and medication use. Results. We identified 2748 children with JIA with a median disease duration of 3.9 years from 51 US clinical sites. Overall, 2023 (74%) had ever received a nonbiologic DMARD and 1246 (45%) had ever received a biologic DMARD. Among children without systemic arthritis, methotrexate use was most strongly associated with uveitis (OR 5.2, 95% CI 3.6–7.6), anticitrullinated protein antibodies (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.7–12), and extended oligoarthritis (OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.5–6.6). Among children without systemic arthritis, biologic DMARD use was most strongly associated with rheumatoid factor (RF)-positive polyarthritis (OR 4.3, 95% CI 2.9–6.6), psoriatic arthritis (PsA; OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.0–4.4), and uveitis (OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.1–3.7). Among children with systemic arthritis, 160 (65%) ever received a biologic DMARD; tumor necrosis factor inhibitor use was associated with polyarthritis (OR 2.5, 95% CI 3.8–16), while interleukin 1 inhibitor use was not. Conclusion. About three-quarters of all children with JIA in the CARRA Registry received nonbiologic DMARD. Nearly one-half received biologic DMARD, and their use was strongly associated with RF-positive polyarthritis, PsA, uveitis, and systemic arthritis.