TY - JOUR T1 - Validation of patient-reported joint counts in rheumatoid arthritis and the role of training. JF - The Journal of Rheumatology JO - J Rheumatol SP - 1261 LP - 1265 VL - 34 IS - 6 AU - Gerald Levy AU - Craig Cheetham AU - Allison Cheatwood AU - Raoul Burchette Y1 - 2007/06/01 UR - http://www.jrheum.org/content/34/6/1261.abstract N2 - OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the effectiveness of simple training on improving the ability of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to assess joint swelling, and to validate the use of a computerized questionnaire, the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-ulous), to collect patient-reported tender and swollen joint counts. METHODS: Sixty patients completed the HAQ-ulous, reporting pain and swelling of the 28 joints included in the Disease Activity Score-28. A rheumatologist blinded to the patients' responses assessed each joint for the presence of tenderness and swelling. At followup visits, 30 patients received training in distinguishing a swollen joint from a chronically enlarged joint, completed the HAQ-ulous again, and were reassessed by the physician. RESULTS: At the initial visit, a strong correlation was shown between patient- and clinician-reported tender joints [Pearson correlation coefficient (r(p)) = 0.79; p < 0.0001]. Correlation between patient- and clinician-reported swollen joints was less robust (r(p) = 0.41; p = 0.001). Following training at the second visit, agreement between patients and the clinician improved for both tender joints (r(p) = 0.94; p < 0.0001) and swollen joints (r(p) = 0.93; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: With simple training in distinguishing swollen joints from chronically enlarged joints, the majority of patients are able to accurately assess joint swelling. Objective tools, such as the HAQ-ulous, that incorporate patient-reported outcomes are a valuable and reliable addition to standard clinical practice for monitoring patients with RA. ER -