Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Conventional Radiographs for Detection of Chronic Structural Changes in Sacroiliac Joints in Axial Spondyloarthritis

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Rudwaleit M,
   2. van der Heijde D,
   3. Landewe R,
   4. Akkoc N,
   5. Brandt J,
   6. Chou CT,
   7. et al.

   The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:25–31.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Rudwaleit M,
   2. Khan MA,
   3. Sieper J

   . The challenge of diagnosis and classification in early ankylosing spondylitis: do we need new criteria? Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:1000–8.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Rudwaleit M,
   2. van der Heijde D,
   3. Khan MA,
   4. Braun J,
   5. Sieper J

   . How to diagnose axial spondyloarthritis early. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:535–43.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. van der Linden S,
   2. Valkenburg HA,
   3. Cats A

   . Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:361–8.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. van Tubergen A,
   2. Heuft-Dorenbosch L,
   3. Schulpen G,
   4. Landewe R,
   5. Wijers R,
   6. van der Heijde D,
   7. et al.

   Radiographic assessment of sacroiliitis by radiologists and rheumatologists: Does training improve quality? Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:519–25.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Mullenders L,
   2. Atkinson M,
   3. Paretzke H,
   4. Sabatier L,
   5. Bouffler S

   . Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation. Nature Rev Cancer 2009;9:596–604.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Rudwaleit M,
   2. Jurik AG,
   3. Hermann KG,
   4. Landewe R,
   5. van der Heijde D,
   6. Baraliakos X,
   7. et al.

   Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1520–7.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Weber U,
   2. Lambert RG,
   3. Pedersen SJ,
   4. Hodler J,
   5. Ostergaard M,
   6. Maksymowych WP

   . Assessment of structural lesions in sacroiliac joints enhances diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging in early spondylarthritis. Arthritis Care Res 2010;62:1763–71.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Haibel H,
   2. Rudwaleit M,
   3. Listing J,
   4. Heldmann F,
   5. Wong RL,
   6. Kupper H,
   7. et al.

   Efficacy of adalimumab in the treatment of axial spondylarthritis without radiographically defined sacroiliitis: results of a twelve-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial followed by an open-label extension up to week fifty-two. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:1981–91.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Song IH,
    2. Hermann K,
    3. Haibel H,
    4. Althoff CE,
    5. Listing J,
    6. Burmester G,
    7. et al.

    Effects of etanercept versus sulfasalazine in early axial spondyloarthritis on active inflammatory lesions as detected by whole-body MRI (ESTHER): a 48-week randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:590–6.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Brandt J,
    2. Khariouzov A,
    3. Listing J,
    4. Haibel H,
    5. Sorensen H,
    6. Grassnickel L,
    7. et al.

    Six-month results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of etanercept treatment in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:1667–75.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Brandt J,
    2. Khariouzov A,
    3. Listing J,
    4. Haibel H,
    5. Sorensen H,
    6. Rudwaleit M,
    7. et al.

    Successful short term treatment of patients with severe undifferentiated spondyloarthritis with the anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha fusion receptor protein etanercept. J Rheumatol 2004;31:531–8.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Braun J,
    2. Brandt J,
    3. Listing J,
    4. Zink A,
    5. Alten R,
    6. Golder W,
    7. et al.

    Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with infliximab: A randomised controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 2002;359:1187–93.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Rudwaleit M,
    2. van der Heijde D,
    3. Landewe R,
    4. Listing J,
    5. Akkoc N,
    6. Brandt J,
    7. et al.

    The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): Validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:777–83.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Bennett PH,
    2. Burch TA

    . Population studies of the rheumatic diseases. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica Foundation International Congress Series 148; 1966:456–7.
16. 16.↵
    1. Song IH,
    2. Hermann KG,
    3. Haibel H,
    4. Althoff CE,
    5. Poddubnyy D,
    6. Listing J,
    7. et al.

    Relationship between active inflammatory lesions in the spine and sacroiliac joints and new development of chronic lesions on whole-body MRI in early axial spondyloarthritis: results of the ESTHER trial at week 48. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1257–63.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Althoff CE,
    2. Sieper J,
    3. Song IH,
    4. Haibel H,
    5. Weiss A,
    6. Diekhoff T,
    7. et al.

    Active inflammation and structural change in early active axial spondyloarthritis as detected by whole-body MRI. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:967–73.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Landis JR,
    2. Koch GG

    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Poddubnyy D,
    2. Rudwaleit M,
    3. Haibel H,
    4. Listing J,
    5. Marker-Hermann E,
    6. Zeidler H,
    7. et al.

    Rates and predictors of radiographic sacroiliitis progression over 2 years in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1369–74.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Vogler JB 3rd.,
    2. Brown WH,
    3. Helms CA,
    4. Genant HK

    . The normal sacroiliac joint: a CT study of asymptomatic patients. Radiology 1984;151:433–7.

    OpenUrlPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Wick MC,
    2. Weiss RJ,
    3. Jaschke W,
    4. Klauser AS

    . Erosions are the most relevant magnetic resonance imaging features in quantification of sacroiliac joints in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 2010;37:622–7.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Weber U,
    2. Lambert RG,
    3. Ostergaard M,
    4. Hodler J,
    5. Pedersen SJ,
    6. Maksymowych WP

    . The diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging in spondylarthritis: An international multicenter evaluation of one hundred eighty-seven subjects. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:3048–58.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Sieper J,
    2. Appel H,
    3. Braun J,
    4. Rudwaleit M

    . Critical appraisal of assessment of structural damage in ankylosing spondylitis: implications for treatment outcomes. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:649–56.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Pedersen SJ,
    2. Chiowchanwisawakit P,
    3. Lambert RG,
    4. Ostergaard M,
    5. Maksymowych WP

    . Resolution of inflammation following treatment of ankylosing spondylitis is associated with new bone formation. J Rheumatol 2011;38:1349–54.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Heuft-Dorenbosch L,
    2. Landewe R,
    3. Weijers R,
    4. Wanders A,
    5. Houben H,
    6. van der Linden S,
    7. et al.

    Combining information obtained from magnetic resonance imaging and conventional radiographs to detect sacroiliitis in patients with recent onset inflammatory back pain. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:804–8.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Geijer M,
    2. Sihlbom H,
    3. Gothlin JH,
    4. Nordborg E

    . The role of CT in the diagnosis of sacro-iliitis. Acta Radiol 1998;39:265–8.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Devauchelle-Pensec V,
    2. D’Agostino MA,
    3. Marion J,
    4. Lapierre M,
    5. Jousse-Joulin S,
    6. Colin D,
    7. et al.

    Computed tomography scanning facilitates the diagnosis of sacroiliitis in patients with suspected spondylarthritis: results of a prospective multicenter French cohort study. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:1412–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Puhakka KB,
    2. Jurik AG,
    3. Egund N,
    4. Schiottz-Christensen B,
    5. Stengaard-Pedersen K,
    6. van Overeem Hansen G,
    7. et al.

    Imaging of sacroiliitis in early seronegative spondylarthropathy. Assessment of abnormalities by MR in comparison with radiography and CT. Acta Radiol 2003;44:218–29.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Berrington de Gonzalez A,
    2. Mahesh M,
    3. Kim KP,
    4. Bhargavan M,
    5. Lewis R,
    6. Mettler F,
    7. et al.

    Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2071–7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Smith-Bindman R,
    2. Lipson J,
    3. Marcus R,
    4. Kim KP,
    5. Hahesh M,
    6. Gould R,
    7. et al.

    Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2078–86.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Gleeson TG,
    2. Byrne B,
    3. Kenny P,
    4. Last J,
    5. Fitzpatrick P,
    6. O’Gorman P,
    7. et al.

    Image quality in low-dose multidetector computed tomography: a pilot study to assess feasibility and dose optimization in whole-body bone imaging. Can Assoc Radiol J 2010;61:258–64.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed