Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • AV Rheum
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • AV Rheum
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Conventional Radiographs for Detection of Chronic Structural Changes in Sacroiliac Joints in Axial Spondyloarthritis

Denis Poddubnyy, Inna Gaydukova, Kay-Geert Hermann, In-Ho Song, Hildrun Haibel, Jürgen Braun and Joachim Sieper
The Journal of Rheumatology September 2013, 40 (9) 1557-1565; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.130141
Denis Poddubnyy
From the Department of Rheumatology, Medical Department I, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Hospital Therapy, Saratov State Medical University, Saratov, Russian Federation; Department of Radiology, Campus Mitte, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; and Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: denis.poddubnyy@charite.de
Inna Gaydukova
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kay-Geert Hermann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
In-Ho Song
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hildrun Haibel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jürgen Braun
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joachim Sieper
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Rudwaleit M,
    2. van der Heijde D,
    3. Landewe R,
    4. Akkoc N,
    5. Brandt J,
    6. Chou CT,
    7. et al.
    The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:25–31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Rudwaleit M,
    2. Khan MA,
    3. Sieper J
    . The challenge of diagnosis and classification in early ankylosing spondylitis: do we need new criteria? Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:1000–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Rudwaleit M,
    2. van der Heijde D,
    3. Khan MA,
    4. Braun J,
    5. Sieper J
    . How to diagnose axial spondyloarthritis early. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:535–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. van der Linden S,
    2. Valkenburg HA,
    3. Cats A
    . Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:361–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. van Tubergen A,
    2. Heuft-Dorenbosch L,
    3. Schulpen G,
    4. Landewe R,
    5. Wijers R,
    6. van der Heijde D,
    7. et al.
    Radiographic assessment of sacroiliitis by radiologists and rheumatologists: Does training improve quality? Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:519–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Mullenders L,
    2. Atkinson M,
    3. Paretzke H,
    4. Sabatier L,
    5. Bouffler S
    . Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation. Nature Rev Cancer 2009;9:596–604.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Rudwaleit M,
    2. Jurik AG,
    3. Hermann KG,
    4. Landewe R,
    5. van der Heijde D,
    6. Baraliakos X,
    7. et al.
    Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1520–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Weber U,
    2. Lambert RG,
    3. Pedersen SJ,
    4. Hodler J,
    5. Ostergaard M,
    6. Maksymowych WP
    . Assessment of structural lesions in sacroiliac joints enhances diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging in early spondylarthritis. Arthritis Care Res 2010;62:1763–71.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Haibel H,
    2. Rudwaleit M,
    3. Listing J,
    4. Heldmann F,
    5. Wong RL,
    6. Kupper H,
    7. et al.
    Efficacy of adalimumab in the treatment of axial spondylarthritis without radiographically defined sacroiliitis: results of a twelve-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial followed by an open-label extension up to week fifty-two. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:1981–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Song IH,
    2. Hermann K,
    3. Haibel H,
    4. Althoff CE,
    5. Listing J,
    6. Burmester G,
    7. et al.
    Effects of etanercept versus sulfasalazine in early axial spondyloarthritis on active inflammatory lesions as detected by whole-body MRI (ESTHER): a 48-week randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:590–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Brandt J,
    2. Khariouzov A,
    3. Listing J,
    4. Haibel H,
    5. Sorensen H,
    6. Grassnickel L,
    7. et al.
    Six-month results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of etanercept treatment in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:1667–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Brandt J,
    2. Khariouzov A,
    3. Listing J,
    4. Haibel H,
    5. Sorensen H,
    6. Rudwaleit M,
    7. et al.
    Successful short term treatment of patients with severe undifferentiated spondyloarthritis with the anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha fusion receptor protein etanercept. J Rheumatol 2004;31:531–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Braun J,
    2. Brandt J,
    3. Listing J,
    4. Zink A,
    5. Alten R,
    6. Golder W,
    7. et al.
    Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with infliximab: A randomised controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 2002;359:1187–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Rudwaleit M,
    2. van der Heijde D,
    3. Landewe R,
    4. Listing J,
    5. Akkoc N,
    6. Brandt J,
    7. et al.
    The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): Validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:777–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Bennett PH,
    2. Burch TA
    . Population studies of the rheumatic diseases. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica Foundation International Congress Series 148; 1966:456–7.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Song IH,
    2. Hermann KG,
    3. Haibel H,
    4. Althoff CE,
    5. Poddubnyy D,
    6. Listing J,
    7. et al.
    Relationship between active inflammatory lesions in the spine and sacroiliac joints and new development of chronic lesions on whole-body MRI in early axial spondyloarthritis: results of the ESTHER trial at week 48. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1257–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Althoff CE,
    2. Sieper J,
    3. Song IH,
    4. Haibel H,
    5. Weiss A,
    6. Diekhoff T,
    7. et al.
    Active inflammation and structural change in early active axial spondyloarthritis as detected by whole-body MRI. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:967–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Landis JR,
    2. Koch GG
    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Poddubnyy D,
    2. Rudwaleit M,
    3. Haibel H,
    4. Listing J,
    5. Marker-Hermann E,
    6. Zeidler H,
    7. et al.
    Rates and predictors of radiographic sacroiliitis progression over 2 years in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1369–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Vogler JB 3rd.,
    2. Brown WH,
    3. Helms CA,
    4. Genant HK
    . The normal sacroiliac joint: a CT study of asymptomatic patients. Radiology 1984;151:433–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Wick MC,
    2. Weiss RJ,
    3. Jaschke W,
    4. Klauser AS
    . Erosions are the most relevant magnetic resonance imaging features in quantification of sacroiliac joints in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 2010;37:622–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Weber U,
    2. Lambert RG,
    3. Ostergaard M,
    4. Hodler J,
    5. Pedersen SJ,
    6. Maksymowych WP
    . The diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging in spondylarthritis: An international multicenter evaluation of one hundred eighty-seven subjects. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:3048–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Sieper J,
    2. Appel H,
    3. Braun J,
    4. Rudwaleit M
    . Critical appraisal of assessment of structural damage in ankylosing spondylitis: implications for treatment outcomes. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:649–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Pedersen SJ,
    2. Chiowchanwisawakit P,
    3. Lambert RG,
    4. Ostergaard M,
    5. Maksymowych WP
    . Resolution of inflammation following treatment of ankylosing spondylitis is associated with new bone formation. J Rheumatol 2011;38:1349–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Heuft-Dorenbosch L,
    2. Landewe R,
    3. Weijers R,
    4. Wanders A,
    5. Houben H,
    6. van der Linden S,
    7. et al.
    Combining information obtained from magnetic resonance imaging and conventional radiographs to detect sacroiliitis in patients with recent onset inflammatory back pain. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:804–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Geijer M,
    2. Sihlbom H,
    3. Gothlin JH,
    4. Nordborg E
    . The role of CT in the diagnosis of sacro-iliitis. Acta Radiol 1998;39:265–8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Devauchelle-Pensec V,
    2. D’Agostino MA,
    3. Marion J,
    4. Lapierre M,
    5. Jousse-Joulin S,
    6. Colin D,
    7. et al.
    Computed tomography scanning facilitates the diagnosis of sacroiliitis in patients with suspected spondylarthritis: results of a prospective multicenter French cohort study. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:1412–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Puhakka KB,
    2. Jurik AG,
    3. Egund N,
    4. Schiottz-Christensen B,
    5. Stengaard-Pedersen K,
    6. van Overeem Hansen G,
    7. et al.
    Imaging of sacroiliitis in early seronegative spondylarthropathy. Assessment of abnormalities by MR in comparison with radiography and CT. Acta Radiol 2003;44:218–29.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Berrington de Gonzalez A,
    2. Mahesh M,
    3. Kim KP,
    4. Bhargavan M,
    5. Lewis R,
    6. Mettler F,
    7. et al.
    Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2071–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Smith-Bindman R,
    2. Lipson J,
    3. Marcus R,
    4. Kim KP,
    5. Hahesh M,
    6. Gould R,
    7. et al.
    Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2078–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Gleeson TG,
    2. Byrne B,
    3. Kenny P,
    4. Last J,
    5. Fitzpatrick P,
    6. O’Gorman P,
    7. et al.
    Image quality in low-dose multidetector computed tomography: a pilot study to assess feasibility and dose optimization in whole-body bone imaging. Can Assoc Radiol J 2010;61:258–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 40, Issue 9
1 Sep 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Conventional Radiographs for Detection of Chronic Structural Changes in Sacroiliac Joints in Axial Spondyloarthritis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
Citation Tools
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Conventional Radiographs for Detection of Chronic Structural Changes in Sacroiliac Joints in Axial Spondyloarthritis
Denis Poddubnyy, Inna Gaydukova, Kay-Geert Hermann, In-Ho Song, Hildrun Haibel, Jürgen Braun, Joachim Sieper
The Journal of Rheumatology Sep 2013, 40 (9) 1557-1565; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.130141

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Conventional Radiographs for Detection of Chronic Structural Changes in Sacroiliac Joints in Axial Spondyloarthritis
Denis Poddubnyy, Inna Gaydukova, Kay-Geert Hermann, In-Ho Song, Hildrun Haibel, Jürgen Braun, Joachim Sieper
The Journal of Rheumatology Sep 2013, 40 (9) 1557-1565; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.130141
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Keywords

AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS
ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS
SACROILIAC JOINTS
SACROILIITIS
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
RADIOGRAPHY

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Profiles in Patients with Incident Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Lupus Nephritis
  • Suboptimal Immunization Coverage among Canadian Rheumatology Patients in Routine Clinical Care
  • Changes in the Presentation of Incident Gout and the Risk of Subsequent Flares: A Population-based Study over 20 Years
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS
  • ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS
  • SACROILIAC JOINTS
  • SACROILIITIS
  • MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
  • RADIOGRAPHY

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • AV Rheum

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2016 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire