%PDF-1.4
%
22 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
71 0 obj
<>stream
Acrobat Distiller 4.05 for Macintosh
2004-12-09T12:02:24Z
2024-03-28T19:09:05-07:00
QuarkXPressª: AdobePS 8.6 (219)
2024-03-28T19:09:05-07:00
application/pdf
Heather
2001-691.june
uuid:30495de5-1dd2-11b2-0a00-df09277d8900
uuid:30495de8-1dd2-11b2-0a00-d30000000000
endstream
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
1 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
4 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
81 0 obj
[85 0 R]
endobj
82 0 obj
<>stream
1 g
/GS0 gs
0 792 m
0 792 l
f
q
-1 793 614 -794 re
W n
q
0 792.06 612 -792 re
W n
/CS0 CS 0 0 0 1 SCN
/GS1 gs
54 54 m
558 54 l
S
BT
/CS0 cs 0 0 0 1 scn
/TT0 1 Tf
0.02499 Tw 8 0 0 8 424.3613 35.9844 Tm
(The Journal of Rheumatology 2002; 29:6)Tj
0 Tw -46.2952 -0.0313 Td
(1226)Tj
ET
0 0 0 0 scn
/GS0 gs
103.25 58.75 407.5 -10.83 re
f*
0.5 w
103.25 58.75 407.5 -10.83 re
S
BT
0 0 0 1 scn
/GS1 gs
/TT1 1 Tf
0.0168 Tc 0.35809 Tw 10 0 0 10 54 713.1616 Tm
[(NPV)-607.2 (when results from the initial 25 patients were)]TJ
0 Tc -0.0233 Tw 0 -1.2 TD
[(compared with the following 44 patients. )54.9 (Another reason for)]TJ
-0.00011 Tc 0.05611 Tw T*
[(the dif)17.7 (ferent results could be the use of a dif)17.7 (ferent scanner)39.7 (,)]TJ
0.0101 Tw T*
[(or dif)17.7 (ferent settings of the scanner)]TJ
0 Tc 0 Tw 6.5 0 0 6.5 191.1977 680.4615 Tm
[(7,1)56.7 (1)]TJ
0.00999 Tw 10 0 0 10 202.204 677.1616 Tm
[(. However)39.8 (, the scanner)]TJ
0.0843 Tw -14.8204 -1.2 Td
(used in our study was considered to have adequate resolu-)Tj
-0.03239 Tw T*
(tion for temporal artery US, according to a recent report)Tj
-0.0567 Tc 0 Tw 6.5 0 0 6.5 274.864 656.4615 Tm
(11)Tj
-0.00011 Tc -0.0323 Tw 10 0 0 10 280.9953 653.1616 Tm
(. In)Tj
0 Tc 0.2959 Tw -22.6995 -1.2 Td
(our opinion, the most likely explanation for the varied)Tj
0.09039 Tw T*
(results is personal variation in the interpretation of the US)Tj
0.02499 Tw T*
(regarding the presence of a halo. )Tj
-0.02811 Tw 1.2 -1.2 Td
(Four of the 12 patients with PMR had positive halo signs.)Tj
0.1403 Tw -1.2 -1.2 Td
(It could be debated whether these represent false positive)Tj
-0.00011 Tc 0.1736 Tw T*
(results or missed diagnoses of GCA. Since all 4 patients)Tj
0 Tc 0.08949 Tw T*
(responded to low dose prednisone \(20 mg or less\) and did)Tj
0.05901 Tw T*
[(not develop any sign or symptom of GCA)-254.1 (during followup)]TJ
0.18739 Tw T*
[(of 1 to 2 years, we believe that GCA)-382.5 (diagnosis was not)]TJ
-0.00011 Tc 0.02499 Tw T*
(missed in these cases.)Tj
0.01849 Tw 1.2 -1.2 Td
[(In conclusion, while results of PPV)-250.8 (vary)64.8 (, the NPV)-250.8 (of the)]TJ
0.16229 Tw -1.2 -1.2 Td
[(halo sign for diagnosing GCA)-357.5 (is consistently high. )17.7 (Thus,)]TJ
0 Tc 0.16119 Tw T*
(color Doppler US of the temporal arteries cannot replace)Tj
-0.00011 Tc 0.09019 Tw T*
[(temporal artery biopsy in diagnosing GCA. However)39.7 (,)-0.1 ( lack)]TJ
0 Tc 0.13969 Tw T*
(of a halo may practically serve to rule out a diagnosis of)Tj
0.01019 Tw T*
(GCA: in cases with negative biopsies there are often doubts)Tj
0.00101 Tw T*
(regarding the possible diagnosis of \223biopsy negative GCA\224.)Tj
0.0083 Tw T*
(In such cases a previous US with a negative halo sign could)Tj
0.02499 Tw T*
(help the physician rule out GCA.)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
-0.00011 Tc 0 Tw 0 -2.4 TD
(REFERENCES)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0.02499 Tw 8 0 0 8 61 391.1616 Tm
[(1.)-875.1 (Hall S, Hunder GG. Is temporal artery biopsy prudent? Mayo Clin)]TJ
0 Tc 1.675 -1.25 Td
(Proc 1984;59:793-6.)Tj
-0.00011 Tc 31.325 41.671 Td
[(2.)-875.1 (Ashton-Key M, Gallagher PH. Sur)17.7 (gical pathology of cranial)]TJ
0 Tc 1.675 -1.25 Td
(arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol)Tj
0 Tw 0 -1.25 TD
(1991;5:387-404.)Tj
0.02499 Tw -1.675 -1.25 Td
[(3.)-875 (Buchbinder R, Detsky )54.9 (AS. Management of suspected giant cell)]TJ
1.675 -1.25 Td
(arteritis: a decision analysis. J Rheumatol 1992;19:1220-8.)Tj
-0.00011 Tc -1.675 -1.25 Td
[(4.)-875.1 (McDonnell PJ, Moore )17.7 (W)91.7 (, Miller NR, Hutchins GM, Green )17.7 (WR.)]TJ
0 Tc 1.675 -1.25 Td
[(T)69.8 (emporal arteritis. )54.8 (A)-219.8 (clinicopathologic study)64.9 (. Ophthalmol)]TJ
0 Tw T*
(1986;93:518-30.)Tj
0.0249 Tw -1.675 -1.25 Td
[(5.)-875 (Nordbor)17.8 (g E, Nordbor)17.8 (g C. )17.7 (The influence of sectional interval on the)]TJ
1.675 -1.25 Td
(reliability of temporal artery biopsies in polymyalgia rheumatica.)Tj
T*
(Clin Rheumatol 1995;14:330-4.)Tj
-0.00011 Tc -1.675 -1.25 Td
[(6.)-875.1 (Ponge )17.7 (T)73.9 (, Barrier JH, Grolleau JY)128.8 (, Ponge )54.8 (A, )17.7 (Vlasak )54.8 (AM, Cottin S.)]TJ
0 Tc 1.675 -1.25 Td
[(The ef)17.8 (ficacy of selective unilateral temporal artery biopsy versus)]TJ
T*
(bilateral biopsies for diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. J Rheumatol)Tj
0 Tw T*
(1988;12:997-1000.)Tj
-0.00011 Tc 0.02499 Tw -1.675 -1.25 Td
[(7.)-875.1 (Schmidt )17.7 (W)110.7 (A, Kraft HE, )17.7 (V)129 (orpahl K, )17.7 (V)129 (olker L, Gromnica-Ihle EJ.)]TJ
0 Tc 1.675 -1.25 Td
(Color duplex ultrasonography in the diagnosis of temporal arteritis.)Tj
T*
(N Engl J Med 1997;337:1336-42.)Tj
-1.675 -1.25 Td
[(8.)-875 (Hunder GG, Bloch DA, Michel BA, et al. )17.7 (The )54.8 (American College of)]TJ
1.675 -1.25 Td
(Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell)Tj
T*
[(arteritis. )54.9 (Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1)36.9 (122-8.)]TJ
-1.675 -1.25 Td
[(9.)-875 (Allsop CJ, Gallagher PJ. )17.7 (T)69.8 (emporal artery biopsy in giant-cell)]TJ
-0.00011 Tc -0.0298 Tw 1.675 -1.25 Td
[(arteritis. A)-219.9 (reappraisal. Am )-54.8 (J )-54.8 (Sur)17.7 (g )-54.9 (Pathol )-54.9 (1981;5:317-23.)]TJ
0.02499 Tw -2.175 -1.25 Td
[(10.)-875.1 (Cox M, Gilks B. Healed or quiescent temporal arteritis versus)]TJ
0 Tc 2.175 -1.25 Td
(senescent changes in temporal artery biopsy specimens. Pathology)Tj
0 Tw T*
(2001;33:163-6.)Tj
0.02499 Tw -2.1381 -1.25 Td
[(1)36.9 (1.)-875 (Schmidt )17.8 (W)110.8 (A. Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of giant cell)]TJ
2.1381 -1.25 Td
(arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2000;18 Suppl 20:S40-2.)Tj
-2.175 -1.25 Td
[(12.)-875 (Salvarani C, Silingardi M, Ghirarduzzi )54.8 (A, et al. Is duplex)]TJ
-0.00011 Tc 2.175 -1.25 Td
(ultrasonography useful for the diagnosis of temporal arteritis?)Tj
0 Tc T*
[([abstract]. )54.9 (Arthritis Rheum 2000;43 Suppl:S366.)]TJ
ET
Q
Q
q
0 0 612 792 re
W n
BT
0 g
/GS2 gs
/T1_0 8 Tf
120.092 51 Td
(Personal non-commercial use only. The Journal of Rheumatology Copyright\
\251 2002. All rights reserved.)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
/GS2 gs
/T1_1 1 Tf
10 0 0 10 540 17 Tm
( )Tj
0 0.48627 0.77255 rg
/GS2 gs
-7.22298 0 Td
(www.jrheum.org)Tj
0 g
/GS2 gs
-16.72996 0 Td
(Downloaded on March 28, 2024 from )Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
64 0 obj
<>
endobj
76 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
59 0 obj
<>stream
HdVpTs͋рlbHvd IAg]v4@y!TwÀ" 錨%UU@
Š0SU(kZ@SQS;w7@ 00K'ƞY|
(͡tn}Ku3( Po]5rW'Pn)-.1ް'^\LA6kA`TsKy;=3㦕q\e0̈3+)n]θwU3Ol
:$+""en]<
6VnlB؏&Ecv\|4("_`-z4xGýe7v<etaIom@B9 Am~&<R/*W3؊*#c%&j7c+@)Iۮf428.Y-ղB:GUn
&.WpGpYR ai^m[mjYvO2X6V>N[||/E2^dTIiVTU32nj }Ve4ƲƓi1(f3g]UՋ{u{.>ƿŔ\.+dy*yRLJ)c260;2ý-s`+?Up%f3n;щ{X
x]ks|38~W$BaW˕)YJfOd1#An@zI^^3Ei!,5_-T=qq,4ǚ!oM]i{,ѝqMwuO#c,e+C;8k'yq/0~}D3c~YqtGVavI5h[VyDg埒8&>3a4ZuԩtHÍ"Zxa8df.syĂUdʹwnu:6*;}cSJ5{S\N'4ժ_B뻥߫fu^)od-rx)a,l9J9q#%usO[V;[o榾s}D_h%^t1
壋GٗE#.d܋/ʹC23,P];c9ڞ93v ASTyyj5Clf(:)9i,Gmz5GZs<~%;G]X،` homqQ'ߎD<;x3o~M4ri P,qdzԁv.z],c]vݰn_Kc/qxbEcv}?nU\odiLncz~U5t&bOfhG$daky5ǂ=:W'/m%}kXkuj6Τxz>Z\]D{g1L_9kXrfɜ9r5(%$8khVD<Ń!f tbo7Z2V>j ;yp3@N,Wxg47br_ ]MD(Oʈ ڇg#Lm[ՋbUD0*1{ |ϊS;zoa4